Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols

Guilherme Janson, Vladimir Leon Salazar, Ruben Leon-Salazar, Marcos Janson, Marcos Roberto de Freitas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations


Introduction: The objective of this study was to cephalometrically compare the stability of complete Class II malocclusion treatment with 2 or 4 premolar extractions after a mean period of 9.35 years. Methods: A sample of 57 records from patients with complete Class II malocclusion was selected and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 patients with an initial mean age of 12.87 years treated with extraction of 2 maxillary premolars. Group 2 consisted of 27 patients with an initial mean age of 13.72 years treated with extraction of 4 premolars. T tests were used to compare the groups' initial cephalometric characteristics and posttreatment changes. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between treatment and posttreatment dental-relationship changes. Results: During the posttreatment period, both groups had similar behavior, except that group 1 had a statistically greater maxillary forward displacement and a greater increase in the apical-base relationship than group 2. On the other hand, group 2 had a statistically greater molar-relationship relapse toward Class II. There were significant positive correlations between the amounts of treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar-relationship changes. Conclusions: Treatment of complete Class II malocclusions with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or 4 premolar extractions had similar long-term posttreatment stability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154.e1-154.e10
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this