Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long-term oncological outcomes of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer

  • Jonathan L. Silberstein
  • , Stephen A. Poon
  • , Daniel D. Sjoberg
  • , Alexandra C. Maschino
  • , Andrew J. Vickers
  • , Aaron Bernie
  • , Badrinath R. Konety
  • , W. Kevin Kelly
  • , James A. Eastham

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective To determine long-term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) for clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer. Patients and Methods In this phase II multicentre trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA level >20 ng/mL, Gleason ≥8, or clinical stage ≥T3), androgen-deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered before RP. We report the long-term oncological outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncological inclusion criteria but received RP only. Results In all, 34 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients had biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10-37%). However, the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66-93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60-89%). The CHT group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (123 patients), with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.34; P = 0.3) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.29; P = 0.2) although these were not statistically significant. Conclusions Neoadjuvant CHT followed by RP was associated with lower rates of BCR and metastasis compared with the RP-only group; however, these results were not statistically significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-56
Number of pages7
JournalBJU International
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • chemotherapy
  • hormone therapy
  • neoadjuvant
  • prostate neoplasms
  • radical prostatectomy
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term oncological outcomes of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this