Living with plague: Lessons from the Soviet Union’s antiplague system

Susan D. Jones, Bakyt Atshabar, Boris V. Schmid, Marlene Zuk, Anna Amramina, Nils Chr Stenseth

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases—switching to control—opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9155-9163
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2019

Fingerprint

Plague
USSR
Zoonoses
Ecosystem
Central Asia
Animal Diseases
Resource Allocation
Ecology
Practice Guidelines
Research
History
Technology
Morbidity
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • Disease control programs
  • Disease ecology
  • Eradication programs
  • USSR history
  • Yersinia pestis

Cite this

Living with plague : Lessons from the Soviet Union’s antiplague system. / Jones, Susan D.; Atshabar, Bakyt; Schmid, Boris V.; Zuk, Marlene; Amramina, Anna; Stenseth, Nils Chr.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 19, 07.05.2019, p. 9155-9163.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Jones, Susan D. ; Atshabar, Bakyt ; Schmid, Boris V. ; Zuk, Marlene ; Amramina, Anna ; Stenseth, Nils Chr. / Living with plague : Lessons from the Soviet Union’s antiplague system. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Vol. 116, No. 19. pp. 9155-9163.
@article{c0d67f6486d74eee9af9d425c633679c,
title = "Living with plague: Lessons from the Soviet Union’s antiplague system",
abstract = "Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases—switching to control—opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.",
keywords = "Disease control programs, Disease ecology, Eradication programs, USSR history, Yersinia pestis",
author = "Jones, {Susan D.} and Bakyt Atshabar and Schmid, {Boris V.} and Marlene Zuk and Anna Amramina and Stenseth, {Nils Chr}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1817339116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "9155--9163",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Living with plague

T2 - Lessons from the Soviet Union’s antiplague system

AU - Jones, Susan D.

AU - Atshabar, Bakyt

AU - Schmid, Boris V.

AU - Zuk, Marlene

AU - Amramina, Anna

AU - Stenseth, Nils Chr

PY - 2019/5/7

Y1 - 2019/5/7

N2 - Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases—switching to control—opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.

AB - Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases—switching to control—opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.

KW - Disease control programs

KW - Disease ecology

KW - Eradication programs

KW - USSR history

KW - Yersinia pestis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065602662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065602662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1817339116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1817339116

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31061115

AN - SCOPUS:85065602662

VL - 116

SP - 9155

EP - 9163

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 19

ER -