TY - JOUR
T1 - Living donor and split-liver transplants in hepatitis C recipients
T2 - Does liver regeneration increase the risk for recurrence?
AU - Humar, Abhinav
AU - Horn, Kirsten
AU - Kalis, Ann
AU - Glessing, Brooke
AU - Payne, William D.
AU - Lake, John
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Concern exists that partial liver transplants (either a living donor [LD] or deceased donor [DD] in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients may be associated with an increased risk for recurrence. From 1999 to 2003, at our institution, 51 HCV-positive recipients underwent liver transplants: 32 whole-liver (WL) transplants, 12 LD transplants and 7 DD split transplants. Donor characteristics differed in that WL donors were older, and LD livers had lower ischemic times. Recipient characteristics were similar except that mean MELD scores in LD recipients were lower (p < 0.05). With a mean follow-up of 28.3 months, 46 (90%) recipients are alive: three died from HCV recurrent liver disease and two from tumor recurrence. Based on 1-year protocol biopsies, the incidence of histologic recurrence in the three groups is as follows: WL, 81%; LD, 50% and DD split, 86% (p = 0.06 for LD versus WL). The mean grade of inflammation on the biopsy specimens was: WL, 1.31; LD, 0.33 and DD split, 1.2 (p = 0.002 for LD versus WL; p = 0.03 for LD versus DD split). Mean stage of fibrosis was: WL, 0.96; LD, 0.22 and DD split, 0.60 (p = 0.07 for LD versus WL). Liver regeneration does not seem to affect hepatitis C recurrence as much, perhaps, as factors such as DD status, donor age and cold ischemic time.
AB - Concern exists that partial liver transplants (either a living donor [LD] or deceased donor [DD] in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients may be associated with an increased risk for recurrence. From 1999 to 2003, at our institution, 51 HCV-positive recipients underwent liver transplants: 32 whole-liver (WL) transplants, 12 LD transplants and 7 DD split transplants. Donor characteristics differed in that WL donors were older, and LD livers had lower ischemic times. Recipient characteristics were similar except that mean MELD scores in LD recipients were lower (p < 0.05). With a mean follow-up of 28.3 months, 46 (90%) recipients are alive: three died from HCV recurrent liver disease and two from tumor recurrence. Based on 1-year protocol biopsies, the incidence of histologic recurrence in the three groups is as follows: WL, 81%; LD, 50% and DD split, 86% (p = 0.06 for LD versus WL). The mean grade of inflammation on the biopsy specimens was: WL, 1.31; LD, 0.33 and DD split, 1.2 (p = 0.002 for LD versus WL; p = 0.03 for LD versus DD split). Mean stage of fibrosis was: WL, 0.96; LD, 0.22 and DD split, 0.60 (p = 0.07 for LD versus WL). Liver regeneration does not seem to affect hepatitis C recurrence as much, perhaps, as factors such as DD status, donor age and cold ischemic time.
KW - Hepatitis C recurrence
KW - Living donor liver
KW - Protocol biopsy
KW - Regeneration
KW - Risk factors
KW - Split livers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13144258749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13144258749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00704.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00704.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 15644001
AN - SCOPUS:13144258749
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 5
SP - 399
EP - 405
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 2
ER -