Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets

Timothy J Kehoe, David K. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two different models in a common environment. The first model has liquidity constraints in that consumers save a single asset that they cannot sell short. The second model has debt constraints in that consumers cannot borrow so much that they would want to default, but is otherwise a standard complete markets model. Both models share the features that individuals are unable to completely insure against idiosyncratic shocks and that interest rates are lower than subjective discount rates. In a stochastic environment, the two models have quite different dynamic properties, with the debt constrained model exhibiting simple stochastic steady states, while the liquidity constrained model has greater persistence of shocks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-598
Number of pages24
JournalEconometrica
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Debt
Liquidity
Idiosyncratic shocks
Complete markets
Discount rate
Interest rates
Debt constraints
Market model
Liquidity constraints
Assets
Persistence

Keywords

  • Collateral
  • Contract enforcement
  • Debt constraint
  • Incomplete markets
  • Liquidity constraint
  • Participation constraint

Cite this

Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets. / Kehoe, Timothy J; Levine, David K.

In: Econometrica, Vol. 69, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 575-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kehoe, Timothy J ; Levine, David K. / Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets. In: Econometrica. 2001 ; Vol. 69, No. 3. pp. 575-598.
@article{72f7b252ae69498b93b04d12512620bd,
title = "Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets",
abstract = "This paper compares two different models in a common environment. The first model has liquidity constraints in that consumers save a single asset that they cannot sell short. The second model has debt constraints in that consumers cannot borrow so much that they would want to default, but is otherwise a standard complete markets model. Both models share the features that individuals are unable to completely insure against idiosyncratic shocks and that interest rates are lower than subjective discount rates. In a stochastic environment, the two models have quite different dynamic properties, with the debt constrained model exhibiting simple stochastic steady states, while the liquidity constrained model has greater persistence of shocks.",
keywords = "Collateral, Contract enforcement, Debt constraint, Incomplete markets, Liquidity constraint, Participation constraint",
author = "Kehoe, {Timothy J} and Levine, {David K.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1468-0262.00206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "575--598",
journal = "Econometrica",
issn = "0012-9682",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liquidity constrained markets versus debt constrained markets

AU - Kehoe, Timothy J

AU - Levine, David K.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This paper compares two different models in a common environment. The first model has liquidity constraints in that consumers save a single asset that they cannot sell short. The second model has debt constraints in that consumers cannot borrow so much that they would want to default, but is otherwise a standard complete markets model. Both models share the features that individuals are unable to completely insure against idiosyncratic shocks and that interest rates are lower than subjective discount rates. In a stochastic environment, the two models have quite different dynamic properties, with the debt constrained model exhibiting simple stochastic steady states, while the liquidity constrained model has greater persistence of shocks.

AB - This paper compares two different models in a common environment. The first model has liquidity constraints in that consumers save a single asset that they cannot sell short. The second model has debt constraints in that consumers cannot borrow so much that they would want to default, but is otherwise a standard complete markets model. Both models share the features that individuals are unable to completely insure against idiosyncratic shocks and that interest rates are lower than subjective discount rates. In a stochastic environment, the two models have quite different dynamic properties, with the debt constrained model exhibiting simple stochastic steady states, while the liquidity constrained model has greater persistence of shocks.

KW - Collateral

KW - Contract enforcement

KW - Debt constraint

KW - Incomplete markets

KW - Liquidity constraint

KW - Participation constraint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034985889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034985889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0262.00206

DO - 10.1111/1468-0262.00206

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 575

EP - 598

JO - Econometrica

JF - Econometrica

SN - 0012-9682

IS - 3

ER -