Linking risk and efficacy in biological control host-parasitoid models

Joe M. Kaser, George E. Heimpel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exotic invasive arthropods present an increasing threat to native species, ecosystem function, crop production, forests, and other natural resources. Importation ('classical') biological control can be a cost-effective tactic for long-term pest management that reduces insecticide use. However, while importation of biological control agents has great potential benefits, it also entails risks to non-target native species. Therefore, candidate biological control agents are studied prior to release to predict safety. Little is known, however, about how traits affecting the safety of biological control agents may impact their efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations. We use a difference equation model to simulate a one-parasitoid two-host system and evaluate conditions under which biological control safety and efficacy interact. We vary the search efficiency and resistance to parasitism of both host species and interpret the results from the standpoint that one host is a target pest and the other a non-target species. We find that apparent competition can have important benefits for increasing biological control efficacy, even at low levels of non-target impact. However, under conditions of parasitoid egg limitation, high attack rates on resistant non-target hosts can dramatically decrease biological control efficacy while concurrently increasing non-target risk. These findings are discussed in the context of biological control agent pre-release risk-benefit assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-60
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Control
Volume90
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

biological control agents
biological control
indigenous species
risk-benefit analysis
pests
nontarget organisms
pest management
natural resources
crop production
arthropods
parasitism
insecticides
ecosystems

Keywords

  • Apparent competition
  • Classical biological control
  • Ecological risk analysis
  • Egg limitation
  • Indirect effects
  • Parasitoid

Cite this

Linking risk and efficacy in biological control host-parasitoid models. / Kaser, Joe M.; Heimpel, George E.

In: Biological Control, Vol. 90, 01.11.2015, p. 49-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{66165c8e750c4c30b7b1d78bfa8df96d,
title = "Linking risk and efficacy in biological control host-parasitoid models",
abstract = "Exotic invasive arthropods present an increasing threat to native species, ecosystem function, crop production, forests, and other natural resources. Importation ('classical') biological control can be a cost-effective tactic for long-term pest management that reduces insecticide use. However, while importation of biological control agents has great potential benefits, it also entails risks to non-target native species. Therefore, candidate biological control agents are studied prior to release to predict safety. Little is known, however, about how traits affecting the safety of biological control agents may impact their efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations. We use a difference equation model to simulate a one-parasitoid two-host system and evaluate conditions under which biological control safety and efficacy interact. We vary the search efficiency and resistance to parasitism of both host species and interpret the results from the standpoint that one host is a target pest and the other a non-target species. We find that apparent competition can have important benefits for increasing biological control efficacy, even at low levels of non-target impact. However, under conditions of parasitoid egg limitation, high attack rates on resistant non-target hosts can dramatically decrease biological control efficacy while concurrently increasing non-target risk. These findings are discussed in the context of biological control agent pre-release risk-benefit assessment.",
keywords = "Apparent competition, Classical biological control, Ecological risk analysis, Egg limitation, Indirect effects, Parasitoid",
author = "Kaser, {Joe M.} and Heimpel, {George E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "49--60",
journal = "Biological Control",
issn = "1049-9644",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking risk and efficacy in biological control host-parasitoid models

AU - Kaser, Joe M.

AU - Heimpel, George E.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Exotic invasive arthropods present an increasing threat to native species, ecosystem function, crop production, forests, and other natural resources. Importation ('classical') biological control can be a cost-effective tactic for long-term pest management that reduces insecticide use. However, while importation of biological control agents has great potential benefits, it also entails risks to non-target native species. Therefore, candidate biological control agents are studied prior to release to predict safety. Little is known, however, about how traits affecting the safety of biological control agents may impact their efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations. We use a difference equation model to simulate a one-parasitoid two-host system and evaluate conditions under which biological control safety and efficacy interact. We vary the search efficiency and resistance to parasitism of both host species and interpret the results from the standpoint that one host is a target pest and the other a non-target species. We find that apparent competition can have important benefits for increasing biological control efficacy, even at low levels of non-target impact. However, under conditions of parasitoid egg limitation, high attack rates on resistant non-target hosts can dramatically decrease biological control efficacy while concurrently increasing non-target risk. These findings are discussed in the context of biological control agent pre-release risk-benefit assessment.

AB - Exotic invasive arthropods present an increasing threat to native species, ecosystem function, crop production, forests, and other natural resources. Importation ('classical') biological control can be a cost-effective tactic for long-term pest management that reduces insecticide use. However, while importation of biological control agents has great potential benefits, it also entails risks to non-target native species. Therefore, candidate biological control agents are studied prior to release to predict safety. Little is known, however, about how traits affecting the safety of biological control agents may impact their efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations. We use a difference equation model to simulate a one-parasitoid two-host system and evaluate conditions under which biological control safety and efficacy interact. We vary the search efficiency and resistance to parasitism of both host species and interpret the results from the standpoint that one host is a target pest and the other a non-target species. We find that apparent competition can have important benefits for increasing biological control efficacy, even at low levels of non-target impact. However, under conditions of parasitoid egg limitation, high attack rates on resistant non-target hosts can dramatically decrease biological control efficacy while concurrently increasing non-target risk. These findings are discussed in the context of biological control agent pre-release risk-benefit assessment.

KW - Apparent competition

KW - Classical biological control

KW - Ecological risk analysis

KW - Egg limitation

KW - Indirect effects

KW - Parasitoid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930940125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930940125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930940125

VL - 90

SP - 49

EP - 60

JO - Biological Control

JF - Biological Control

SN - 1049-9644

ER -