Linguistic maze production by children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Katherine J. Bangert, Lizbeth H. Finestack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Purpose: Previous investigations reveal that children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) produce elevated rates of linguistic mazes (i.e., filled pauses, repetitions, revisions, and/or abandoned utterances) in expressive language samples (Redmond, 2004). The current study aimed to better understand maze use of children and adolescents with ADHD with a focus on the specific maze types produced in different language sampling contexts based on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2; Lord et al., 2012). Method: Participants included twenty-five 4-to 13-year-olds with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD. Each participant completed the ADOS to provide narrative and conversational language samples. Research assistants transcribed at least 100 utterances from the ADOS using Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (Miller & Chapman, 2000) conventions. Dependent variables included the rates of repetitions, revisions, filled pauses, content mazes (Thordardottir & Ellis Weismer, 2002), and stalls (Rispoli, 2003; Rispoli, Hadley, & Holt, 2008) produced in narrative and conversational portions of the ADOS. Results: In the full sample, participants produced a significantly greater rate of revisions than filled pauses (p = .01) and repetitions (p < .01). Participants also produced a significantly lower rate of filled pauses than content mazes (p < .01). Across contexts, participants produced a higher rate of filled pauses in conversational versus narrative contexts. Age was positively correlated with revisions and content mazes. Mean length of utterance was positively correlated with revisions, repetitions, and context mazes. Expressive language ability was positively correlated with filled pauses and stalls. Conclusion: The children and adolescents in our sample demonstrated a unique profile of maze use. Sampling context had a limited influence on maze use, whereas maze use was impacted by age, mean length of utterance, and expressive language ability. Study findings highlight the importance of analyzing maze types separately rather than as a single category.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-285
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 22 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid Award from the University of Minnesota and National Institutes of Health Grant R01HD065277. We are grateful to all of the participating families and to the clinical and research staff contributing to the study.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Linguistic maze production by children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this