Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8T cell subsets

E. John Wherry, Volker Teichgräber, Todd C. Becker, David Masopust, Susan M. Kaech, Rustom Antia, Ulrich H. von Andrian, Rafi Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1520 Scopus citations


Memory CD8 T cells can be divided into two subsets, central (TCM) and effector (TEM), but their lineage relationships and their ability to persist and confer protective immunity are not well understood. Our results show that TCM have a greater capacity than TEM to persist in vivo and are more efficient in mediating protective immunity because of their increased proliferative potential. We also demonstrate that, following antigen clearance, TEM convert to TCM and that the duration of this differentiation is programmed within the first week after immunization. We propose that TCM and TEM do not necessarily represent distinct subsets, but are part of a continuum in a linear naive → effector → TEM → TCM differentiation pathway.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-234
Number of pages10
JournalNature immunology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
for helpful discussions. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI30048 and AI44644 (to R.Ahmed), a Cancer Research Institute fellowship (to E.J.W. and D.M.) and a Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell fellowship (to S.M.K.).


Dive into the research topics of 'Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8T cell subsets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this