Limitations of observational evidence: Implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations

Kevin C. Maki, Joanne L. Slavin, Tia M. Rains, Penny M. Kris-Etherton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for establishing relations between exposures, including dietary exposures, and health outcomes. However, not all diet and health outcome relations can be practically or ethically evaluated by using RCTs; therefore, many dietary recommendations are supported by evidence primarily from observational data, particularly those from prospective cohort studies. Although such evidence is of critical importance, limitations are often underappreciated by nutrition scientists and policymakers. This editorial review is intended to 1) highlight some of these limitations of observational evidence for diet-disease relations, including imprecise exposure quantification, collinearity among dietary exposures, displacement/substitution effects, healthy/unhealthy consumer bias, residual confounding, and effect modification; and 2) advocate for greater caution in the communication of dietary recommendations for which RCT evidence of clinical event reduction after dietary intervention is not available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-15
Number of pages9
JournalAdvances in Nutrition
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

dietary exposure
dietary recommendations
Randomized Controlled Trials
communication (human)
cohort studies
diet
Diet
Health
nutrition
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Cite this

Limitations of observational evidence : Implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations. / Maki, Kevin C.; Slavin, Joanne L.; Rains, Tia M.; Kris-Etherton, Penny M.

In: Advances in Nutrition, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014, p. 7-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maki, Kevin C. ; Slavin, Joanne L. ; Rains, Tia M. ; Kris-Etherton, Penny M. / Limitations of observational evidence : Implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations. In: Advances in Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 7-15.
@article{4eda52e033c8483485f2426c8e153eb6,
title = "Limitations of observational evidence: Implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations",
abstract = "Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for establishing relations between exposures, including dietary exposures, and health outcomes. However, not all diet and health outcome relations can be practically or ethically evaluated by using RCTs; therefore, many dietary recommendations are supported by evidence primarily from observational data, particularly those from prospective cohort studies. Although such evidence is of critical importance, limitations are often underappreciated by nutrition scientists and policymakers. This editorial review is intended to 1) highlight some of these limitations of observational evidence for diet-disease relations, including imprecise exposure quantification, collinearity among dietary exposures, displacement/substitution effects, healthy/unhealthy consumer bias, residual confounding, and effect modification; and 2) advocate for greater caution in the communication of dietary recommendations for which RCT evidence of clinical event reduction after dietary intervention is not available.",
author = "Maki, {Kevin C.} and Slavin, {Joanne L.} and Rains, {Tia M.} and Kris-Etherton, {Penny M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3945/an.113.004929",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "7--15",
journal = "Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)",
issn = "2161-8313",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitations of observational evidence

T2 - Implications for evidence-based dietary recommendations

AU - Maki, Kevin C.

AU - Slavin, Joanne L.

AU - Rains, Tia M.

AU - Kris-Etherton, Penny M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for establishing relations between exposures, including dietary exposures, and health outcomes. However, not all diet and health outcome relations can be practically or ethically evaluated by using RCTs; therefore, many dietary recommendations are supported by evidence primarily from observational data, particularly those from prospective cohort studies. Although such evidence is of critical importance, limitations are often underappreciated by nutrition scientists and policymakers. This editorial review is intended to 1) highlight some of these limitations of observational evidence for diet-disease relations, including imprecise exposure quantification, collinearity among dietary exposures, displacement/substitution effects, healthy/unhealthy consumer bias, residual confounding, and effect modification; and 2) advocate for greater caution in the communication of dietary recommendations for which RCT evidence of clinical event reduction after dietary intervention is not available.

AB - Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the strongest evidence for establishing relations between exposures, including dietary exposures, and health outcomes. However, not all diet and health outcome relations can be practically or ethically evaluated by using RCTs; therefore, many dietary recommendations are supported by evidence primarily from observational data, particularly those from prospective cohort studies. Although such evidence is of critical importance, limitations are often underappreciated by nutrition scientists and policymakers. This editorial review is intended to 1) highlight some of these limitations of observational evidence for diet-disease relations, including imprecise exposure quantification, collinearity among dietary exposures, displacement/substitution effects, healthy/unhealthy consumer bias, residual confounding, and effect modification; and 2) advocate for greater caution in the communication of dietary recommendations for which RCT evidence of clinical event reduction after dietary intervention is not available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903548362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903548362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3945/an.113.004929

DO - 10.3945/an.113.004929

M3 - Article

C2 - 24425715

AN - SCOPUS:84903548362

VL - 5

SP - 7

EP - 15

JO - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

JF - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

SN - 2161-8313

IS - 1

ER -