TY - JOUR
T1 - Light resistance and stretching exercise in elderly women
T2 - Effect upon strength
AU - Agre, J. C.
AU - Pierce, L. E.
AU - Raab, D. M.
AU - McAdams, M.
AU - Smith, E. L.
PY - 1988
Y1 - 1988
N2 - Forty-seven elderly women (63 to 88 years of age, mean=71 years) were studied to determine the effect of a 25-week light resistance and aerobic exercise program upon arm and leg strength. Three groups were formed: nonexercising controls (C, n=12), exercise (EN, n=18) and exercise with light weights on the wrists and ankles (EW, n=17). Exercise was performed for one hour, three times/week. Subjects were pretested and posttested for maximal isokinetic muscle strength (angular velocity 60°/sec) for elbow flexion and extension, shoulder internal and external rotation, and knee flexion and extension. Dunn planned contrasts were used to compare C vs exercise groups combined (EN + EW) and EN vs EW. No significant differences were found among groups at baseline. EN + EW improved significantly (p<0.05) more than C in elbow extension (17%), shoulder internal rotation (14%), shoulder external rotation (9%), and knee flexion (20%). No significant differences were found between EN and EW. These data indicate that elderly women can achieve substantial gains in the strength of arm and leg musculature as a result of regular light resistance and aerobic exercise, but that the use of light weights on the wrists and ankles for added resistance did not enhance this effect.
AB - Forty-seven elderly women (63 to 88 years of age, mean=71 years) were studied to determine the effect of a 25-week light resistance and aerobic exercise program upon arm and leg strength. Three groups were formed: nonexercising controls (C, n=12), exercise (EN, n=18) and exercise with light weights on the wrists and ankles (EW, n=17). Exercise was performed for one hour, three times/week. Subjects were pretested and posttested for maximal isokinetic muscle strength (angular velocity 60°/sec) for elbow flexion and extension, shoulder internal and external rotation, and knee flexion and extension. Dunn planned contrasts were used to compare C vs exercise groups combined (EN + EW) and EN vs EW. No significant differences were found among groups at baseline. EN + EW improved significantly (p<0.05) more than C in elbow extension (17%), shoulder internal rotation (14%), shoulder external rotation (9%), and knee flexion (20%). No significant differences were found between EN and EW. These data indicate that elderly women can achieve substantial gains in the strength of arm and leg musculature as a result of regular light resistance and aerobic exercise, but that the use of light weights on the wrists and ankles for added resistance did not enhance this effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023920111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023920111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 3355357
AN - SCOPUS:0023920111
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 69
SP - 273
EP - 276
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 4
ER -