Lifestyle alternatives for rhizobia: Mutualism, parasitism, and forgoing symbiosis

R. Ford Denison, E. Toby Kiers

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

126 Scopus citations

Abstract

Strains of rhizobia within a single species can have three different genetically determined strategies. Mutualistic rhizobia provide their legume hosts with nitrogen. Parasitic rhizobia infect legumes, but fix little or no nitrogen. Nonsymbiotic strains are unable to infect legumes at all. Why have rhizobium strains with one of these three strategies not displaced the others? A symbiotic (mutualistic or parasitic) rhizobium that succeeds in founding a nodule may produce many millions of descendants. The chances of success can be so low, however, that nonsymbiotic rhizobia can have greater reproductive success. Legume sanctions against nodules that fix little or no nitrogen favor more mutualistic strains, but parasitic strains that use plant resources only for their own reproduction may do well when they share nodules with mutualistic strains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-193
Number of pages7
JournalFEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume237
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Evolution
  • Ineffective
  • Mutualism
  • Nitrogen-fixation
  • Parasitism
  • Rhizobium
  • Sanction
  • Symbiosis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lifestyle alternatives for rhizobia: Mutualism, parasitism, and forgoing symbiosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this