Life STEM

A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design

S. Selcen Guzey, Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen, Michael R Harwell, Yadira Peralta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The emphasis of reform-oriented science education today focuses on engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms. However, there is little research, particularly longitudinal research, on how different approaches to engineering integration influence student learning and interest. To address this gap in the literature, this study analyzed a middle school life science teacher’s enactment of three design-focused life science units and student performances over a 3-year period. Findings indicate that the design and enactment of each unit reflects a unique engineering integration approach: add on, implicit, and explicit. Moreover, the ways the teacher talked about engineering varied among each curriculum unit. Through the analyses of 330 students’ pre- and post-content tests and interest surveys as well as videotaped classroom instruction, we found that explicit engineering integration and engineering language use in classroom instruction resulted in higher student learning gains in science and engineering, but they did not have significant effects on students’ interest in science and engineering. We explore the implications for curricular materials and discuss a need for long-term professional development and support for teachers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-42
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2019

Fingerprint

Life sciences
life sciences
Engineering Design
engineering
Engineering
learning
Student Learning
science
student
classroom
Unit
teacher
instruction
Science Education
Professional Development
Learning
Life
curriculum
reform
language

Keywords

  • Engineering integration
  • Interdisciplinary science
  • Student interest
  • Student learning

Cite this

Life STEM : A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design. / Guzey, S. Selcen; Ring-Whalen, Elizabeth A.; Harwell, Michael R; Peralta, Yadira.

In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 17, No. 1, 15.01.2019, p. 23-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guzey, S. Selcen ; Ring-Whalen, Elizabeth A. ; Harwell, Michael R ; Peralta, Yadira. / Life STEM : A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design. In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 23-42.
@article{4ab034eab8da4933ab4f9b86987adf3b,
title = "Life STEM: A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design",
abstract = "The emphasis of reform-oriented science education today focuses on engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms. However, there is little research, particularly longitudinal research, on how different approaches to engineering integration influence student learning and interest. To address this gap in the literature, this study analyzed a middle school life science teacher’s enactment of three design-focused life science units and student performances over a 3-year period. Findings indicate that the design and enactment of each unit reflects a unique engineering integration approach: add on, implicit, and explicit. Moreover, the ways the teacher talked about engineering varied among each curriculum unit. Through the analyses of 330 students’ pre- and post-content tests and interest surveys as well as videotaped classroom instruction, we found that explicit engineering integration and engineering language use in classroom instruction resulted in higher student learning gains in science and engineering, but they did not have significant effects on students’ interest in science and engineering. We explore the implications for curricular materials and discuss a need for long-term professional development and support for teachers.",
keywords = "Engineering integration, Interdisciplinary science, Student interest, Student learning",
author = "Guzey, {S. Selcen} and Ring-Whalen, {Elizabeth A.} and Harwell, {Michael R} and Yadira Peralta",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "23--42",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education",
issn = "1571-0068",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life STEM

T2 - A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design

AU - Guzey, S. Selcen

AU - Ring-Whalen, Elizabeth A.

AU - Harwell, Michael R

AU - Peralta, Yadira

PY - 2019/1/15

Y1 - 2019/1/15

N2 - The emphasis of reform-oriented science education today focuses on engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms. However, there is little research, particularly longitudinal research, on how different approaches to engineering integration influence student learning and interest. To address this gap in the literature, this study analyzed a middle school life science teacher’s enactment of three design-focused life science units and student performances over a 3-year period. Findings indicate that the design and enactment of each unit reflects a unique engineering integration approach: add on, implicit, and explicit. Moreover, the ways the teacher talked about engineering varied among each curriculum unit. Through the analyses of 330 students’ pre- and post-content tests and interest surveys as well as videotaped classroom instruction, we found that explicit engineering integration and engineering language use in classroom instruction resulted in higher student learning gains in science and engineering, but they did not have significant effects on students’ interest in science and engineering. We explore the implications for curricular materials and discuss a need for long-term professional development and support for teachers.

AB - The emphasis of reform-oriented science education today focuses on engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms. However, there is little research, particularly longitudinal research, on how different approaches to engineering integration influence student learning and interest. To address this gap in the literature, this study analyzed a middle school life science teacher’s enactment of three design-focused life science units and student performances over a 3-year period. Findings indicate that the design and enactment of each unit reflects a unique engineering integration approach: add on, implicit, and explicit. Moreover, the ways the teacher talked about engineering varied among each curriculum unit. Through the analyses of 330 students’ pre- and post-content tests and interest surveys as well as videotaped classroom instruction, we found that explicit engineering integration and engineering language use in classroom instruction resulted in higher student learning gains in science and engineering, but they did not have significant effects on students’ interest in science and engineering. We explore the implications for curricular materials and discuss a need for long-term professional development and support for teachers.

KW - Engineering integration

KW - Interdisciplinary science

KW - Student interest

KW - Student learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030677200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030677200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0

DO - 10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 23

EP - 42

JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

SN - 1571-0068

IS - 1

ER -