TY - JOUR
T1 - Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emission analysis for a water resource recovery facility in India
AU - Miller-Robbie, Leslie
AU - Ramaswami, Anu
AU - Kumar, Prasanna
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - This paper quantifies life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) in India versus water quality improvements achieved from infrastructure investments. A first such analysis is conducted using operating data for a WRRF, which employs upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors and oxidation. On-site operations energy use, process GHG emissions, and embodied energy in infrastructure were quantified. The analysis showed energy use and GHG emissions of 0.2 watt-hours (Wh) and 0.3 gram carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents per liter (gCO2e/L) wastewater treated, and 1.3 Wh and 2.1 gCO 2e/gBOD removed, achieving 81% biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 99% fecal coliform removal annually. Process emissions of WRRFs contributed 44% of life cycle GHG emissions, similar in magnitude to those from electricity (46%), whereas infrastructure contributed 10%. Average WRRF-associated GHG emissions (0.9gCO2e/L) were lower than those expected if untreated wastewater was released to the river. Investments made by WRRFs in developing world cities improve water quality and may mitigate overall GHG emissions.
AB - This paper quantifies life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) in India versus water quality improvements achieved from infrastructure investments. A first such analysis is conducted using operating data for a WRRF, which employs upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors and oxidation. On-site operations energy use, process GHG emissions, and embodied energy in infrastructure were quantified. The analysis showed energy use and GHG emissions of 0.2 watt-hours (Wh) and 0.3 gram carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents per liter (gCO2e/L) wastewater treated, and 1.3 Wh and 2.1 gCO 2e/gBOD removed, achieving 81% biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 99% fecal coliform removal annually. Process emissions of WRRFs contributed 44% of life cycle GHG emissions, similar in magnitude to those from electricity (46%), whereas infrastructure contributed 10%. Average WRRF-associated GHG emissions (0.9gCO2e/L) were lower than those expected if untreated wastewater was released to the river. Investments made by WRRFs in developing world cities improve water quality and may mitigate overall GHG emissions.
KW - Developing cities
KW - Energy
KW - Greenhouse gas
KW - India
KW - Life cycle
KW - Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket
KW - Wastewater treatment plant
KW - Water resource recovery facility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880523575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880523575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2175/106143012X13560205144371
DO - 10.2175/106143012X13560205144371
M3 - Article
C2 - 23944144
AN - SCOPUS:84880523575
SN - 1061-4303
VL - 85
SP - 621
EP - 631
JO - Water Environment Research
JF - Water Environment Research
IS - 7
ER -