Liability for robots II: An economic analysis

Alice Guerra, Francesco Parisi, Daniel Pi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This is the second of two companion papers that discuss accidents caused by robots. In the first paper (Guerra et al.2021), we presented the novel problems posed by robot accidents, and assessed the related legal approaches and institutional opportunities. In this paper, we build on the previous analysis to consider a novel liability regime, which we refer to as 'manufacturer residual liability' rule. This makes operators and victims liable for accidents due to their negligence - hence, incentivizing them to act diligently; and makes manufacturers residually liable for non-negligent accidents - hence, incentivizing them to make optimal investments in R&D for robots' safety. In turn, this rule will bring down the price of safer robots, driving unsafe technology out of the market. Thanks to the percolation effect of residual liability, operators will also be incentivized to adopt optimal activity levels in robots' usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Millennium Economics Ltd.

Keywords

  • Automated technology
  • liability
  • manufacturer residual liability
  • negligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liability for robots II: An economic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this