Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts

Michael L Wilson, Christophe Boesch, Barbara Fruth, Takeshi Furuichi, Ian C. Gilby, Chie Hashimoto, Catherine L. Hobaiter, Gottfried Hohmann, Noriko Itoh, Kathelijne Koops, Julia N. Lloyd, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, John C. Mitani, Deus C. Mjungu, David Morgan, Martin N. Muller, Roger Mundry, Michio Nakamura, Jill Pruetz, Anne E. PuseyJulia Riedel, Crickette Sanz, Anne M. Schel, Nicole Simmons, Michel Waller, David P. Watts, Frances White, Roman M. Wittig, Klaus Zuberbühler, Richard W. Wrangham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

172 Scopus citations

Abstract

Observations of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) provide valuable comparative data for understanding the significance of conspecific killing. Two kinds of hypothesis have been proposed. Lethal violence is sometimes concluded to be the result of adaptive strategies, such that killers ultimately gain fitness benefits by increasing their access to resources such as food or mates. Alternatively, it could be a non-adaptive result of human impacts, such as habitat change or food provisioning. To discriminate between these hypotheses we compiled information from 18 chimpanzee communities and 4 bonobo communities studied over five decades. Our data include 152 killings (n = 58 observed, 41 inferred, and 53 suspected killings) by chimpanzees in 15 communities and one suspected killing by bonobos. We found that males were the most frequent attackers (92% of participants) and victims (73%); most killings (66%) involved intercommunity attacks; and attackers greatly outnumbered their victims (median 8:1 ratio). Variation in killing rates was unrelated to measures of human impacts. Our results are compatible with previously proposed adaptive explanations for killing by chimpanzees, whereas the human impact hypothesis is not supported.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)414-417
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume513
Issue number7518
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2014

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This study was funded by National Science Foundation grants BCS-0648481 and LTREB-1052693 and National Institutes of Health grant R01 AI 058715. Numerous additional sources of funding have supported the long-term studies that contributed data to this study. We thank J. H. Jones for statistical advice; L. Pintea for preparing the map for Extended Data Fig. 1b; I. Lipende and R. Lawrence for providing details on recent cases at Gombe and Kanyantale; S. Amsler for helping to calculate the range of the Kanyantale community, and the many field assistants who collected data.

Publisher Copyright:
©2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this