Less intense postacute care, better outcomes for enrollees in medicare advantage than those in fee-for-service

Peter J. Huckfeldt, José J. Escarce, Brendan Rabideau, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Neeraj Sood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare's prospective payment systems for postacute care provide little incentive to coordinate care or control costs. In contrast, Medicare Advantage plans pay for postacute care out of monthly capitated payments and thus have stronger incentives to use it efficiently. We compared the use of postacute care in skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities by enrollees in Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare after hospital discharge for three highvolume conditions: Lower extremity joint replacement, stroke, and heart failure. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics at discharge, we found lower intensity of postacute care for Medicare Advantage patients compared to FFS Medicare patients discharged from the same hospital, across all three conditions. Medicare Advantage patients also exhibited better outcomes than their FFS Medicare counterparts, including lower rates of hospital readmission and higher rates of return to the community. These findings suggest that payment reforms such as bundling in FFS Medicare may reduce the intensity of postacute care without adversely affecting patient health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Subacute Care
Medicare Part C
Fee-for-Service Plans
Medicare
Motivation
Replacement Arthroplasties
Rehabilitation Nursing
Prospective Payment System
Patient Readmission
Cost Control
Inpatients
Lower Extremity
Heart Failure
Stroke
Health

Cite this

Less intense postacute care, better outcomes for enrollees in medicare advantage than those in fee-for-service. / Huckfeldt, Peter J.; Escarce, José J.; Rabideau, Brendan; Karaca-Mandic, Pinar; Sood, Neeraj.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43bafeafebf2436a89ea0e2d95882cb6,
title = "Less intense postacute care, better outcomes for enrollees in medicare advantage than those in fee-for-service",
abstract = "Traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare's prospective payment systems for postacute care provide little incentive to coordinate care or control costs. In contrast, Medicare Advantage plans pay for postacute care out of monthly capitated payments and thus have stronger incentives to use it efficiently. We compared the use of postacute care in skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities by enrollees in Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare after hospital discharge for three highvolume conditions: Lower extremity joint replacement, stroke, and heart failure. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics at discharge, we found lower intensity of postacute care for Medicare Advantage patients compared to FFS Medicare patients discharged from the same hospital, across all three conditions. Medicare Advantage patients also exhibited better outcomes than their FFS Medicare counterparts, including lower rates of hospital readmission and higher rates of return to the community. These findings suggest that payment reforms such as bundling in FFS Medicare may reduce the intensity of postacute care without adversely affecting patient health.",
author = "Huckfeldt, {Peter J.} and Escarce, {Jos{\'e} J.} and Brendan Rabideau and Pinar Karaca-Mandic and Neeraj Sood",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Less intense postacute care, better outcomes for enrollees in medicare advantage than those in fee-for-service

AU - Huckfeldt, Peter J.

AU - Escarce, José J.

AU - Rabideau, Brendan

AU - Karaca-Mandic, Pinar

AU - Sood, Neeraj

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare's prospective payment systems for postacute care provide little incentive to coordinate care or control costs. In contrast, Medicare Advantage plans pay for postacute care out of monthly capitated payments and thus have stronger incentives to use it efficiently. We compared the use of postacute care in skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities by enrollees in Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare after hospital discharge for three highvolume conditions: Lower extremity joint replacement, stroke, and heart failure. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics at discharge, we found lower intensity of postacute care for Medicare Advantage patients compared to FFS Medicare patients discharged from the same hospital, across all three conditions. Medicare Advantage patients also exhibited better outcomes than their FFS Medicare counterparts, including lower rates of hospital readmission and higher rates of return to the community. These findings suggest that payment reforms such as bundling in FFS Medicare may reduce the intensity of postacute care without adversely affecting patient health.

AB - Traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare's prospective payment systems for postacute care provide little incentive to coordinate care or control costs. In contrast, Medicare Advantage plans pay for postacute care out of monthly capitated payments and thus have stronger incentives to use it efficiently. We compared the use of postacute care in skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities by enrollees in Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare after hospital discharge for three highvolume conditions: Lower extremity joint replacement, stroke, and heart failure. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics at discharge, we found lower intensity of postacute care for Medicare Advantage patients compared to FFS Medicare patients discharged from the same hospital, across all three conditions. Medicare Advantage patients also exhibited better outcomes than their FFS Medicare counterparts, including lower rates of hospital readmission and higher rates of return to the community. These findings suggest that payment reforms such as bundling in FFS Medicare may reduce the intensity of postacute care without adversely affecting patient health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011886920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011886920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1027

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1027

M3 - Article

C2 - 28069851

AN - SCOPUS:85011886920

VL - 36

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 1

ER -