TY - JOUR
T1 - Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes
AU - Cannon, Steven B.
AU - Sterck, Lieven
AU - Rombauts, Stephane
AU - Sato, Shusei
AU - Cheung, Foo
AU - Gouzy, Jérôme
AU - Wang, Xiaohong
AU - Mudge, Joann
AU - Vasdewani, Jayprakash
AU - Scheix, Thomas
AU - Spannagl, Manuel
AU - Monaghan, Erin
AU - Nicholson, Christine
AU - Humphray, Sean J.
AU - Schoof, Heiko
AU - Mayer, Klaus F.X.
AU - Rogers, Jane
AU - Quétier, Francis
AU - Oldroyd, Giles E.
AU - Debellé, Frédéric
AU - Cook, Douglas R.
AU - Retzel, Ernest F.
AU - Roe, Bruce A.
AU - Town, Christopher D.
AU - Tabata, Satoshi
AU - Van De Peer, Yves
AU - Young, Nevin D
PY - 2006/10/3
Y1 - 2006/10/3
N2 - Genome sequencing of the model legumes, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus, provides an opportunity for large-scale sequence-based comparison of two genomes in the same plant family. Here we report synteny comparisons between these species, including details about chromosome relationships, large-scale synteny blocks, microsynteny within blocks, and genome regions lacking clear correspondence. The Lotus and Medicago genomes share a minimum of 10 large-scale synteny blocks, each with substantial collinearity and frequently extending the length of whole chromosome arms. The proportion of genes syntenic and collinear within each synteny block is relatively homogeneous. Medicago-Lotus comparisons also indicate similar and largely homogeneous gene densities, although gene-containing regions in Mt occupy 20-30% more space than Lj counterparts, primarily because of larger numbers of Mt retrotransposons. Because the interpretation of genome comparisons is complicated by large-scale genome duplications, we describe synteny, synonymous substitutions and phylogenetic analyses to identify and date a probable whole-genome duplication event. There is no direct evidence for any recent large-scale genome duplication in either Medicago or Lotus but instead a duplication predating speciation. Phylogenetic comparisons place this duplication within the Rosid I clade, clearly after the split between legumes and Salicaceae (poplar).
AB - Genome sequencing of the model legumes, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus, provides an opportunity for large-scale sequence-based comparison of two genomes in the same plant family. Here we report synteny comparisons between these species, including details about chromosome relationships, large-scale synteny blocks, microsynteny within blocks, and genome regions lacking clear correspondence. The Lotus and Medicago genomes share a minimum of 10 large-scale synteny blocks, each with substantial collinearity and frequently extending the length of whole chromosome arms. The proportion of genes syntenic and collinear within each synteny block is relatively homogeneous. Medicago-Lotus comparisons also indicate similar and largely homogeneous gene densities, although gene-containing regions in Mt occupy 20-30% more space than Lj counterparts, primarily because of larger numbers of Mt retrotransposons. Because the interpretation of genome comparisons is complicated by large-scale genome duplications, we describe synteny, synonymous substitutions and phylogenetic analyses to identify and date a probable whole-genome duplication event. There is no direct evidence for any recent large-scale genome duplication in either Medicago or Lotus but instead a duplication predating speciation. Phylogenetic comparisons place this duplication within the Rosid I clade, clearly after the split between legumes and Salicaceae (poplar).
KW - Genome duplication
KW - Polyploidy
KW - Synteny
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749532842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749532842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0603228103
DO - 10.1073/pnas.0603228103
M3 - Article
C2 - 17003129
AN - SCOPUS:33749532842
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 103
SP - 14959
EP - 14964
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 40
ER -