Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Left ventricular dilatation increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with reduced systolic function

  • Ryan G. Aleong
  • , Matthew J. Mulvahill
  • , Indrani Halder
  • , Nichole E. Carlson
  • , Madhurmeet Singh
  • , Heather L. Bloom
  • , Samuel C. Dudley
  • , Patrick T. Ellinor
  • , Alaa Shalaby
  • , Raul Weiss
  • , Rebecca Gutmann
  • , William H. Sauer
  • , Kumar Narayanan
  • , Sumeet S. Chugh
  • , Samir Saba
  • , Barry London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background-—Reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias; however, LV ejection fraction has a low sensitivity to predict ventricular arrhythmias. LV dilatation and mass may be useful to further risk-stratify for ventricular arrhythmias. Methods and Results-—Patients from the Genetic Risk of Assessment of Defibrillator Events (GRADE) study (N=930), a study of heart failure subjects with defibrillators, were assessed for appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock and death, heart transplant, or ventricular assist device placement by LV diameter and mass. LV mass was divided into normal, mild, moderate, and severe classifications. Severe LV end-diastolic diameter had worse shock-free survival than normal and mild LV enddiastolic diameter (P=0.0002 and 0.0063, respectively; 2-year shock free, severe 74%, moderate 80%, mild 91%, normal 88%; 4-year shock free, severe 62%, moderate 69%, mild 72%, normal 81%) and freedom from death, transplant, or ventricular assist device compared with normal and moderate LV end-diastolic diameter (P<0.0001 and 0.0441, respectively; 2-year survival: severe 78%, moderate 85%, mild 82%, normal 89%; 4-year survival: severe 55%, moderate 64%, mild 63%, normal 74%). Severe LV mass had worse shock-free survival than normal and mild LV mass (P=0.0370 and 0.0280, respectively; 2-year shock free: severe 80%, moderate 81%, mild 91%, normal 87%; 4-year shock free: severe 68%, moderate 73%, mild 76%, normal 76%) but no association with death, transplant, or ventricular assist device (P=0.1319). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic diameter was associated with appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks (hazard ratio 1.22, P=0.020). LV end-diastolic diameter was associated with time to death, transplant, or ventricular assist device (hazard ratio 1.29, P=0.0009). Conclusions-—LV dilatation may complement ejection fraction to predict ventricular arrhythmias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere001566
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Keywords

  • Heart failure
  • Ventricular arrhythmias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Left ventricular dilatation increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with reduced systolic function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this