TY - JOUR
T1 - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Hypertrophic and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
AU - Kaul, Risheek
AU - Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
AU - Ranka, Sagar
AU - Demmer, Ryan T.
AU - Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
AU - Aronow, Wilbert S.
AU - Warraich, Haider J.
AU - Pan, Stephen
AU - Panza, Julio A.
AU - Cooper, Howard A.
AU - Naidu, Srihari S.
AU - Colombo, Paolo C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © ASAIO 2020.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with advanced heart failure due to hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy (HCM/RCM) presents technical and physiologic challenges. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to evaluate the utilization and clinical outcomes associated with LVAD implantation in patients with HCM/RCM and compared these to patients with dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy (DCM/ICM). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception through May 2019 and included appropriate studies describing the use of an LVAD in patients with HCM/RCM. We identified six studies with a total of 2,766 patients with HCM/RCM and advanced heart failure, among whom 338 patients (12.2%) underwent LVAD implantation. In patients listed for transplant, the rate of LVAD implantation was significantly lower in patients with HCM/RCM compared to that in patients with DCM/ICM (4.4% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001). Adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in HCM/RCM than in DCM/ICM, including operative/short-term mortality (14.0% vs. 9.0%), right ventricular failure (50.0% vs. 21.0%), infection (15.5% vs. 11.2%), bleeding (40.2% vs. 12.5%), renal failure (15.0% vs. 5.1%), stroke (5.0% vs. 2.4%), and arrhythmias (18.0% vs. 7.7%) (all p values <0.001).
AB - Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with advanced heart failure due to hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy (HCM/RCM) presents technical and physiologic challenges. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to evaluate the utilization and clinical outcomes associated with LVAD implantation in patients with HCM/RCM and compared these to patients with dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy (DCM/ICM). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception through May 2019 and included appropriate studies describing the use of an LVAD in patients with HCM/RCM. We identified six studies with a total of 2,766 patients with HCM/RCM and advanced heart failure, among whom 338 patients (12.2%) underwent LVAD implantation. In patients listed for transplant, the rate of LVAD implantation was significantly lower in patients with HCM/RCM compared to that in patients with DCM/ICM (4.4% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001). Adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in HCM/RCM than in DCM/ICM, including operative/short-term mortality (14.0% vs. 9.0%), right ventricular failure (50.0% vs. 21.0%), infection (15.5% vs. 11.2%), bleeding (40.2% vs. 12.5%), renal failure (15.0% vs. 5.1%), stroke (5.0% vs. 2.4%), and arrhythmias (18.0% vs. 7.7%) (all p values <0.001).
KW - dilated cardiomyopathy
KW - hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
KW - left ventricular assist devices
KW - mechanical circulatory support
KW - refractory heart failure
KW - restrictive cardiomyopathy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102154923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102154923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/mat.0000000000001238
DO - 10.1097/mat.0000000000001238
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33627595
AN - SCOPUS:85102154923
SN - 1058-2916
VL - 67
SP - 239
EP - 244
JO - ASAIO Journal
JF - ASAIO Journal
IS - 3
ER -