Laying off credit risk: Loan sales versus credit default swaps

Christine A. Parlour, Andrew Winton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations


How do markets for debt cash flow rights, with and without accompanying control rights, affect the efficiency of lending? A bank makes a loan, learns if it needs monitoring, and then decides whether to lay off credit risk. The bank can transfer credit risk by either selling the loan or buying a credit default swap (CDS). With a CDS, the originating bank retains the loan's control rights; with loan sales, control rights pass to the loan buyer. Credit risk transfer leads to excessive monitoring of riskier credits and insufficient monitoring of safer credits. Increases in banks' cost of equity capital exacerbate these effects. For riskier credits, loan sales typically dominate CDS but not for safer credits. Once repeated lending and consequent reputation concerns are modeled, although CDSs remain dominated by loan sales for riskier credits, for safer credits they can dominate loan sales, supporting better monitoring (albeit to a limited extent) while allowing efficient risk sharing. Restrictions on the bank's ability to sell the loan expand the range in which CDSs are used and monitoring is too low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-45
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Financial Economics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2013


  • Control rights
  • Credit default swaps
  • Credit risk
  • G21
  • G28
  • G32
  • Loan sales


Dive into the research topics of 'Laying off credit risk: Loan sales versus credit default swaps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this