This article examines juvenile justice policy and practice with a special focus on changes over the past quarter-century that have both challenged and reasserted juvenile courts' founding principles that children do indeed differ from adults. Section I provides an overview of the early juvenile court-its philosophical underpinnings and historic mission. Section II examines the "due process revolution" of the 1960s and assesses its intended and unintended consequences. Section III focuses on punitive shifts in juvenile justice policies during the 1980s and 1990s. It identifies the structural and political sources of "get tough" policies, examines the reformulation of adolescents' culpability, and explores their impact on juvenile justice administration. Section IV examines the contemporary juvenile court and recent responses to juvenile courts' historical deficiencies and the punitive overreaction of the 1990s. It assays how new research on adolescent competence and culpability has implicated critical issues in juvenile justice administration and influenced youth crime policy.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Criminal Justice|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|State||Published - Sep 18 2012|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2011 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
- Adolescent culpability
- Due process
- Get tough policies
- Juvenile court
- Juvenile justice administration
- Juvenile justice policy
- Youth crime policy