Abstract
In conversation people make specific statements that are intended to accomplish some particular social action (e.g., to praise, criticize or sympathize). To communicate effectively, people must consensually perceive the intentions of each other's messages. In this research we examined the degree of consensus in judgments of communicative intent. Participants engaged in separate, brief conversations with three friends, watched videotapes of their interactions, and judged the communicative intent of 6 randomly selected statements. Observers also judged these statements under one of three conditions: audio-visual, audio, or text. Analyses showed that participants agreed strongly in their judgments of intent and that observers also agreed in their judgments, but not as much as participants.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-302 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judgments of communicative intent in conversation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS