Isokinetic strength testing in older women: A comparison of two systems

M. E. Cress, J. Johnson, J. C. Agre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Isokinetic equipment is used for measuring muscular strength for both experimental and rehabilitative purposes. In this study two LIDO® isokinetic dynamometer systems, the LIDO-digital and the LIDO-active, were compared at 60, 180, 240, and 300°/sec for peak torque (PT) and average work output (WO) of knee flexion and extension. Twenty-five elderly women (age range = 65-86) were tested on both systems within seven days. The data were compared by using a repeated measures ANOVA followed by a Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc comparison (p ≤ .0125). Knee flexion PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities tested. Knee extension PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all speeds except 180°/sec. Knee flexion WO was significantly different p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities except 60°/sec; whereas, knee extension WO was not significantly different. The data indicate that for healthy women over 65, these two systems are not totally comparable for knee extension and flexion. Therefore, in both clinical and experimental settings, caution should be taken when comparing results across systems or when comparing patients' results with norms established from data obtained on a different system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-202
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Knee
Torque
Analysis of Variance
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

Isokinetic strength testing in older women : A comparison of two systems. / Cress, M. E.; Johnson, J.; Agre, J. C.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.01.1991, p. 199-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcb0e4c6b64240d188657adfe2cf94cb,
title = "Isokinetic strength testing in older women: A comparison of two systems",
abstract = "Isokinetic equipment is used for measuring muscular strength for both experimental and rehabilitative purposes. In this study two LIDO{\circledR} isokinetic dynamometer systems, the LIDO-digital and the LIDO-active, were compared at 60, 180, 240, and 300°/sec for peak torque (PT) and average work output (WO) of knee flexion and extension. Twenty-five elderly women (age range = 65-86) were tested on both systems within seven days. The data were compared by using a repeated measures ANOVA followed by a Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc comparison (p ≤ .0125). Knee flexion PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities tested. Knee extension PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all speeds except 180°/sec. Knee flexion WO was significantly different p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities except 60°/sec; whereas, knee extension WO was not significantly different. The data indicate that for healthy women over 65, these two systems are not totally comparable for knee extension and flexion. Therefore, in both clinical and experimental settings, caution should be taken when comparing results across systems or when comparing patients' results with norms established from data obtained on a different system.",
author = "Cress, {M. E.} and J. Johnson and Agre, {J. C.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2519/jospt.1991.13.4.199",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "199--202",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy",
issn = "0190-6011",
publisher = "JOSPT",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isokinetic strength testing in older women

T2 - A comparison of two systems

AU - Cress, M. E.

AU - Johnson, J.

AU - Agre, J. C.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Isokinetic equipment is used for measuring muscular strength for both experimental and rehabilitative purposes. In this study two LIDO® isokinetic dynamometer systems, the LIDO-digital and the LIDO-active, were compared at 60, 180, 240, and 300°/sec for peak torque (PT) and average work output (WO) of knee flexion and extension. Twenty-five elderly women (age range = 65-86) were tested on both systems within seven days. The data were compared by using a repeated measures ANOVA followed by a Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc comparison (p ≤ .0125). Knee flexion PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities tested. Knee extension PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all speeds except 180°/sec. Knee flexion WO was significantly different p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities except 60°/sec; whereas, knee extension WO was not significantly different. The data indicate that for healthy women over 65, these two systems are not totally comparable for knee extension and flexion. Therefore, in both clinical and experimental settings, caution should be taken when comparing results across systems or when comparing patients' results with norms established from data obtained on a different system.

AB - Isokinetic equipment is used for measuring muscular strength for both experimental and rehabilitative purposes. In this study two LIDO® isokinetic dynamometer systems, the LIDO-digital and the LIDO-active, were compared at 60, 180, 240, and 300°/sec for peak torque (PT) and average work output (WO) of knee flexion and extension. Twenty-five elderly women (age range = 65-86) were tested on both systems within seven days. The data were compared by using a repeated measures ANOVA followed by a Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc comparison (p ≤ .0125). Knee flexion PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities tested. Knee extension PT was significantly different (p ≤ .0125) at all speeds except 180°/sec. Knee flexion WO was significantly different p ≤ .0125) at all angular velocities except 60°/sec; whereas, knee extension WO was not significantly different. The data indicate that for healthy women over 65, these two systems are not totally comparable for knee extension and flexion. Therefore, in both clinical and experimental settings, caution should be taken when comparing results across systems or when comparing patients' results with norms established from data obtained on a different system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026092898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026092898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.4.199

DO - 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.4.199

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026092898

VL - 13

SP - 199

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

SN - 0190-6011

IS - 4

ER -