Is there really a split in schizophrenia? The genetic evidence

P. McGuffin, A. Farmer, I. I. Gottesman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although the clinical presentation and course of schizophrenia is highly variable, it is unclear whether this reflects heterogeneity at an aetiological level. The genetic evidence is reviewed concerning 'traditional' clinical subtypes as well as more novel categories derived from multivariate statistical methods and Crow's type I-type II classification. Recent data based on a twin series and re-analysis of older published family material suggest that attempts to divide up schizophrenia have resulted in splits between two or more categories of disorder which occupy different positions on the same continuum of liability. Thus, apparent heterogeneity is more likely to be due to quantitative difference in familial-genetic loading rather than qualitative differences. Similarly, the hypothesis that schizophrenia can be broadly divided into two groups, one genetic and the other non-genetic has little to support it. It seems improbable that any further useful and genetically relevant subdivision of schizophrenia can be effected on purely clinical grounds. Further progress awaits developments in the discovery of endophenotypes and the application of molecular genetic marker strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-592
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume150
Issue numberMAY.
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is there really a split in schizophrenia? The genetic evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this