Is the Assessment of Personality Comparable in Persons Who Have and Have Not Experienced Depressive, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders? An Examination of Measurement Invariance

Thomas M. Olino, Laura Benini, Grace Icenogle, Sylia Wilson, Daniel N. Klein, John R. Seeley, Peter M. Lewinsohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerous studies have focused on characterizing personality differences between individuals with and without psychopathology. For drawing valid conclusions for these comparisons, the personality instruments used must demonstrate psychometric equivalence. However, we are unaware of any studies that examine measurement invariance in personality across individuals with and without psychopathology. This study conducted tests of measurement invariance for positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition across individuals with and without histories of depressive, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We found consistent evidence that positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition were assessed equivalently across all comparisons with each demonstrating strict invariance. Overall, results suggest that comparisons of personality measures between diagnostic groups satisfy the assumption of measurement invariance and these scales represent the same psychological constructs. Thus, mean-level comparisons across these groups are valid tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-55
Number of pages11
JournalAssessment
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Substance-Related Disorders
Personality
Anxiety
Psychopathology
Psychometrics
Individuality
Psychology

Keywords

  • measurement invariance
  • personality
  • psychopathology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Is the Assessment of Personality Comparable in Persons Who Have and Have Not Experienced Depressive, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders? An Examination of Measurement Invariance. / Olino, Thomas M.; Benini, Laura; Icenogle, Grace; Wilson, Sylia; Klein, Daniel N.; Seeley, John R.; Lewinsohn, Peter M.

In: Assessment, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 45-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olino, Thomas M. ; Benini, Laura ; Icenogle, Grace ; Wilson, Sylia ; Klein, Daniel N. ; Seeley, John R. ; Lewinsohn, Peter M. / Is the Assessment of Personality Comparable in Persons Who Have and Have Not Experienced Depressive, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders? An Examination of Measurement Invariance. In: Assessment. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 45-55.
@article{bceea32dd53e41039de3106944e08dce,
title = "Is the Assessment of Personality Comparable in Persons Who Have and Have Not Experienced Depressive, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders? An Examination of Measurement Invariance",
abstract = "Numerous studies have focused on characterizing personality differences between individuals with and without psychopathology. For drawing valid conclusions for these comparisons, the personality instruments used must demonstrate psychometric equivalence. However, we are unaware of any studies that examine measurement invariance in personality across individuals with and without psychopathology. This study conducted tests of measurement invariance for positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition across individuals with and without histories of depressive, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We found consistent evidence that positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition were assessed equivalently across all comparisons with each demonstrating strict invariance. Overall, results suggest that comparisons of personality measures between diagnostic groups satisfy the assumption of measurement invariance and these scales represent the same psychological constructs. Thus, mean-level comparisons across these groups are valid tests.",
keywords = "measurement invariance, personality, psychopathology",
author = "Olino, {Thomas M.} and Laura Benini and Grace Icenogle and Sylia Wilson and Klein, {Daniel N.} and Seeley, {John R.} and Lewinsohn, {Peter M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191117725171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "45--55",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Assessment of Personality Comparable in Persons Who Have and Have Not Experienced Depressive, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders? An Examination of Measurement Invariance

AU - Olino, Thomas M.

AU - Benini, Laura

AU - Icenogle, Grace

AU - Wilson, Sylia

AU - Klein, Daniel N.

AU - Seeley, John R.

AU - Lewinsohn, Peter M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Numerous studies have focused on characterizing personality differences between individuals with and without psychopathology. For drawing valid conclusions for these comparisons, the personality instruments used must demonstrate psychometric equivalence. However, we are unaware of any studies that examine measurement invariance in personality across individuals with and without psychopathology. This study conducted tests of measurement invariance for positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition across individuals with and without histories of depressive, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We found consistent evidence that positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition were assessed equivalently across all comparisons with each demonstrating strict invariance. Overall, results suggest that comparisons of personality measures between diagnostic groups satisfy the assumption of measurement invariance and these scales represent the same psychological constructs. Thus, mean-level comparisons across these groups are valid tests.

AB - Numerous studies have focused on characterizing personality differences between individuals with and without psychopathology. For drawing valid conclusions for these comparisons, the personality instruments used must demonstrate psychometric equivalence. However, we are unaware of any studies that examine measurement invariance in personality across individuals with and without psychopathology. This study conducted tests of measurement invariance for positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition across individuals with and without histories of depressive, anxiety, and substance use disorders. We found consistent evidence that positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and disinhibition were assessed equivalently across all comparisons with each demonstrating strict invariance. Overall, results suggest that comparisons of personality measures between diagnostic groups satisfy the assumption of measurement invariance and these scales represent the same psychological constructs. Thus, mean-level comparisons across these groups are valid tests.

KW - measurement invariance

KW - personality

KW - psychopathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041321879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041321879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191117725171

DO - 10.1177/1073191117725171

M3 - Article

C2 - 28799407

AN - SCOPUS:85041321879

VL - 26

SP - 45

EP - 55

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 1

ER -