Is Switzerland in a great depression?

Timothy J Kehoe, Kim J. Ruhl

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abrahamsen, Aeppli, Atukeren, Graff, Müller, and Schips [2005. The Swiss disease: Facts and artefacts. A reply to Kehoe and Prescott. Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (3), 749-758, this issue] object to Kehoe and Prescott's [2002. Great depressions of the 20th century. Review of Economic Dynamics 5 (1), 1-18] characterization of the Swiss economy as being in a great depression over the period 1974-2000. They argue that (1) depressions should be defined in terms of declines in labor productivity rather than in GDP; (2) examining deviations from trend in GDP is equivalent to examining levels; (3) Swiss data from the 1970s should be ignored because it is of low quality and because the 1970s were a period of turmoil in the Swiss labor market; (4) Swiss GDP data should be adjusted to account for appreciations in the terms of trade; and (5) the change in Swiss national accounts from a system based on SNA68 to one based on SNA93 will make Swiss economic performance look better. In this note, we find that none of these arguments have merit except for, possibly, the need to adjust GDP data for changes in the terms of trade. We conclude that Switzerland has indeed suffered a great depression and, in fact, is mired in it even today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)759-775
Number of pages17
JournalReview of Economic Dynamics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Switzerland
Great Depression
Economic dynamics
Terms of trade
Economic performance
National accounts
Labour market
Deviation
20th century
Labour productivity

Cite this

Is Switzerland in a great depression? / Kehoe, Timothy J; Ruhl, Kim J.

In: Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.01.2005, p. 759-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Kehoe, Timothy J ; Ruhl, Kim J. / Is Switzerland in a great depression?. In: Review of Economic Dynamics. 2005 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 759-775.
@article{1540cd0c66f541f187a4d8808f615cd9,
title = "Is Switzerland in a great depression?",
abstract = "Abrahamsen, Aeppli, Atukeren, Graff, M{\"u}ller, and Schips [2005. The Swiss disease: Facts and artefacts. A reply to Kehoe and Prescott. Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (3), 749-758, this issue] object to Kehoe and Prescott's [2002. Great depressions of the 20th century. Review of Economic Dynamics 5 (1), 1-18] characterization of the Swiss economy as being in a great depression over the period 1974-2000. They argue that (1) depressions should be defined in terms of declines in labor productivity rather than in GDP; (2) examining deviations from trend in GDP is equivalent to examining levels; (3) Swiss data from the 1970s should be ignored because it is of low quality and because the 1970s were a period of turmoil in the Swiss labor market; (4) Swiss GDP data should be adjusted to account for appreciations in the terms of trade; and (5) the change in Swiss national accounts from a system based on SNA68 to one based on SNA93 will make Swiss economic performance look better. In this note, we find that none of these arguments have merit except for, possibly, the need to adjust GDP data for changes in the terms of trade. We conclude that Switzerland has indeed suffered a great depression and, in fact, is mired in it even today.",
author = "Kehoe, {Timothy J} and Ruhl, {Kim J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.red.2005.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "759--775",
journal = "Review of Economic Dynamics",
issn = "1094-2025",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Switzerland in a great depression?

AU - Kehoe, Timothy J

AU - Ruhl, Kim J.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Abrahamsen, Aeppli, Atukeren, Graff, Müller, and Schips [2005. The Swiss disease: Facts and artefacts. A reply to Kehoe and Prescott. Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (3), 749-758, this issue] object to Kehoe and Prescott's [2002. Great depressions of the 20th century. Review of Economic Dynamics 5 (1), 1-18] characterization of the Swiss economy as being in a great depression over the period 1974-2000. They argue that (1) depressions should be defined in terms of declines in labor productivity rather than in GDP; (2) examining deviations from trend in GDP is equivalent to examining levels; (3) Swiss data from the 1970s should be ignored because it is of low quality and because the 1970s were a period of turmoil in the Swiss labor market; (4) Swiss GDP data should be adjusted to account for appreciations in the terms of trade; and (5) the change in Swiss national accounts from a system based on SNA68 to one based on SNA93 will make Swiss economic performance look better. In this note, we find that none of these arguments have merit except for, possibly, the need to adjust GDP data for changes in the terms of trade. We conclude that Switzerland has indeed suffered a great depression and, in fact, is mired in it even today.

AB - Abrahamsen, Aeppli, Atukeren, Graff, Müller, and Schips [2005. The Swiss disease: Facts and artefacts. A reply to Kehoe and Prescott. Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (3), 749-758, this issue] object to Kehoe and Prescott's [2002. Great depressions of the 20th century. Review of Economic Dynamics 5 (1), 1-18] characterization of the Swiss economy as being in a great depression over the period 1974-2000. They argue that (1) depressions should be defined in terms of declines in labor productivity rather than in GDP; (2) examining deviations from trend in GDP is equivalent to examining levels; (3) Swiss data from the 1970s should be ignored because it is of low quality and because the 1970s were a period of turmoil in the Swiss labor market; (4) Swiss GDP data should be adjusted to account for appreciations in the terms of trade; and (5) the change in Swiss national accounts from a system based on SNA68 to one based on SNA93 will make Swiss economic performance look better. In this note, we find that none of these arguments have merit except for, possibly, the need to adjust GDP data for changes in the terms of trade. We conclude that Switzerland has indeed suffered a great depression and, in fact, is mired in it even today.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22344450229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22344450229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.red.2005.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.red.2005.03.003

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 8

SP - 759

EP - 775

JO - Review of Economic Dynamics

JF - Review of Economic Dynamics

SN - 1094-2025

IS - 3

ER -