Is restricting sales of malt liquor beverages effective in reducing crime in urban areas?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the effects of outlet and small area level malt liquor policies on crime in 10 U.S. cities and hypothesized that more restrictive malt liquor policies would be associated with greater reductions in crime. Method: We used a pooled time-series study design (i.e., panel regression) with comparison areas to test our hypothesis. Quarterly crime rates in targeted areas were compared 3 years before and after policy adoption. Four crime outcomes were analyzed: Selected Part II crimes, assaults, vandalism/property damage, and disorderly conduct. Both the presence and absence of a malt liquor policy (yes, no) and degree of restrictiveness of the malt liquor policy were assessed using a newly created measure of malt liquor policy restrictiveness developed by the investigators. Results were analyzed using a series of linear mixed models. Results: Adoption of malt liquor policies was not associated with Part II selected crimes. For individual crimes (e.g., assaults, vandalism, disorderly conduct), we found mixed results as more restrictive malt liquor policies were significantly associated with decreases as well as increases in crime. In general, the evaluated policies were considered to be not highly restrictive. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that malt liquor policies at the outlet or small area level alone may not be sufficient to reduce crime associated with malt liquor use. Policies that are more restrictive or cover larger areas than assessed in the current study may be required to have an independent effect on crime outcomes. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 79, 826–834, 2018).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)826-834
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs
Volume79
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Beverages
Crime
sales
Sales
urban area
offense
vandalism
assault
crime rate
time series
damages
Time series
alcohol
Linear Models
drug
Alcohols
regression
Research Personnel

Cite this

Is restricting sales of malt liquor beverages effective in reducing crime in urban areas? / Jones-Webb, Rhonda J; McKee, Patricia; Joshi, Spruha; Erickson, Darin J; Toomey, Traci L; Nelson, Toben F.

In: Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, Vol. 79, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 826-834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46b055f2927546f686fd6b4b9e5e9fca,
title = "Is restricting sales of malt liquor beverages effective in reducing crime in urban areas?",
abstract = "Objective: We evaluated the effects of outlet and small area level malt liquor policies on crime in 10 U.S. cities and hypothesized that more restrictive malt liquor policies would be associated with greater reductions in crime. Method: We used a pooled time-series study design (i.e., panel regression) with comparison areas to test our hypothesis. Quarterly crime rates in targeted areas were compared 3 years before and after policy adoption. Four crime outcomes were analyzed: Selected Part II crimes, assaults, vandalism/property damage, and disorderly conduct. Both the presence and absence of a malt liquor policy (yes, no) and degree of restrictiveness of the malt liquor policy were assessed using a newly created measure of malt liquor policy restrictiveness developed by the investigators. Results were analyzed using a series of linear mixed models. Results: Adoption of malt liquor policies was not associated with Part II selected crimes. For individual crimes (e.g., assaults, vandalism, disorderly conduct), we found mixed results as more restrictive malt liquor policies were significantly associated with decreases as well as increases in crime. In general, the evaluated policies were considered to be not highly restrictive. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that malt liquor policies at the outlet or small area level alone may not be sufficient to reduce crime associated with malt liquor use. Policies that are more restrictive or cover larger areas than assessed in the current study may be required to have an independent effect on crime outcomes. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 79, 826–834, 2018).",
author = "Jones-Webb, {Rhonda J} and Patricia McKee and Spruha Joshi and Erickson, {Darin J} and Toomey, {Traci L} and Nelson, {Toben F}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15288/jsad.2018.79.826",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "826--834",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is restricting sales of malt liquor beverages effective in reducing crime in urban areas?

AU - Jones-Webb, Rhonda J

AU - McKee, Patricia

AU - Joshi, Spruha

AU - Erickson, Darin J

AU - Toomey, Traci L

AU - Nelson, Toben F

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: We evaluated the effects of outlet and small area level malt liquor policies on crime in 10 U.S. cities and hypothesized that more restrictive malt liquor policies would be associated with greater reductions in crime. Method: We used a pooled time-series study design (i.e., panel regression) with comparison areas to test our hypothesis. Quarterly crime rates in targeted areas were compared 3 years before and after policy adoption. Four crime outcomes were analyzed: Selected Part II crimes, assaults, vandalism/property damage, and disorderly conduct. Both the presence and absence of a malt liquor policy (yes, no) and degree of restrictiveness of the malt liquor policy were assessed using a newly created measure of malt liquor policy restrictiveness developed by the investigators. Results were analyzed using a series of linear mixed models. Results: Adoption of malt liquor policies was not associated with Part II selected crimes. For individual crimes (e.g., assaults, vandalism, disorderly conduct), we found mixed results as more restrictive malt liquor policies were significantly associated with decreases as well as increases in crime. In general, the evaluated policies were considered to be not highly restrictive. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that malt liquor policies at the outlet or small area level alone may not be sufficient to reduce crime associated with malt liquor use. Policies that are more restrictive or cover larger areas than assessed in the current study may be required to have an independent effect on crime outcomes. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 79, 826–834, 2018).

AB - Objective: We evaluated the effects of outlet and small area level malt liquor policies on crime in 10 U.S. cities and hypothesized that more restrictive malt liquor policies would be associated with greater reductions in crime. Method: We used a pooled time-series study design (i.e., panel regression) with comparison areas to test our hypothesis. Quarterly crime rates in targeted areas were compared 3 years before and after policy adoption. Four crime outcomes were analyzed: Selected Part II crimes, assaults, vandalism/property damage, and disorderly conduct. Both the presence and absence of a malt liquor policy (yes, no) and degree of restrictiveness of the malt liquor policy were assessed using a newly created measure of malt liquor policy restrictiveness developed by the investigators. Results were analyzed using a series of linear mixed models. Results: Adoption of malt liquor policies was not associated with Part II selected crimes. For individual crimes (e.g., assaults, vandalism, disorderly conduct), we found mixed results as more restrictive malt liquor policies were significantly associated with decreases as well as increases in crime. In general, the evaluated policies were considered to be not highly restrictive. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that malt liquor policies at the outlet or small area level alone may not be sufficient to reduce crime associated with malt liquor use. Policies that are more restrictive or cover larger areas than assessed in the current study may be required to have an independent effect on crime outcomes. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 79, 826–834, 2018).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058870843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058870843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.826

DO - 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.826

M3 - Article

C2 - 30573012

AN - SCOPUS:85058870843

VL - 79

SP - 826

EP - 834

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 6

ER -