Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately bayesian?

Richard F. MacLehose, Paul Gustafson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Case-control studies are particularly susceptible to differential exposure misclassification when exposure status is determined following incident case status. Probabilistic bias analysis methods have been developed as ways to adjust standard effect estimates based on the sensitivity and specificity of exposure misclassification. The iterative sampling method advocated in probabilistic bias analysis bears a distinct resemblance to a Bayesian adjustment; however, it is not identical. Furthermore, without a formal theoretical framework (Bayesian or frequentist), the results of a probabilistic bias analysis remain somewhat difficult to interpret. We describe, both theoretically and empirically, the extent to which probabilistic bias analysis can be viewed as approximately Bayesian. Although the differences between probabilistic bias analysis and Bayesian approaches to misclassification can be substantial, these situations often involve unrealistic prior specifications and are relatively easy to detect. Outside of these special cases, probabilistic bias analysis and Bayesian approaches to exposure misclassification in case-control studies appear to perform equally well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-158
Number of pages8
JournalEpidemiology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately bayesian?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this