Is it a typical crosstalk: Need for re-implantation?

Zeynettin Kaya, Kursat Akbuga, Alpay Aribas, Ilknur Can

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


With constantly evolving technology and an ever-increasing number of patients with pacemakers, clinicians will encounter various pacemaker malfunctions in their practice. While some of these issues can be solved even by using only the pacemakers mode settings, others require re-intervention; neglecting a pacemakers malfunction without full investigation threatens the patients life. In this report, we describe a patient with a dual-chamber pacemaker with neglected or unresolved dyssynchronization that occurred 2 years after implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-117
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Arrhythmia
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.


  • Crosstalk
  • Dislocation
  • Lead switch
  • Pacemaker
  • Safety mode


Dive into the research topics of 'Is it a typical crosstalk: Need for re-implantation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this