Abstract
Context: Media messaging matters for public opinion and policy, and analyzing patterns of campaign strategy can provide important windows into policy priorities. Methods: The authors used content analysis supplemented with keyword-based text analysis to assess the volume, proportion, and distribution of media attention to race-related issues in comparison to gender-related issues during the general election period of the 2022 midterm campaigns for federal office in the United States. Findings: Race-related mentions in campaign advertising were overwhelmingly focused on crime and law and order, with very little attention to racism, racial injustice, and the structural barriers that lead to widespread inequities. In stark contrast to mentions of gender, racial appeals were less identity focused and were competitively contested between the parties in their messaging, but they were much more likely to be led by Republicans. Conclusions: The results suggest that discussions of race and gender were highly polarized, with consequences for public understanding of and belief in disparities and policies important to population health.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-537 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Journal of health politics, policy and law |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 by Duke University Press.
Keywords
- gender
- identity politics
- political advertising
- race
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Invoking Identity? Partisan Polarization in Discussions of Race, Racism, and Gender in 2022 Midterm Advertising in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS