Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science: Implications for research and institutional practices

Moin Syed, Carlos Santos, Hyung Chol Yoo, Linda P. Juang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

García Coll et al.'s (1996) integrative model was a landmark article for developmental science, and for psychology more broadly, in outlining the multitude of social and cultural factors at play when seeking to understand the development of racial/ethnic minority children. The time is ripe to not only take stock of those advances but also evaluate the integrative model in the context of present-day research practice within developmental psychology, and psychology more broadly. The purpose of this article is to bring a systemic perspective to developmental science through a discussion of current practices in the field. To do so, we examine invisibility, or how dominant practices serve to overlook, silence, or dismiss knowledge produced by and for racial/ethnic minority populations. Guided by the interpretive framework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991), we discuss three key questions: From whose vantage point is research conducted? What types of questions are valued? And who gets left out? We then conclude with recommendations for changes in practices for individuals, institutions, and the field at large. Importantly, although our analysis is largely grounded in research and practices in developmental psychology, it is also highly relevant to psychological science as a whole.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)812-826
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Institutional Practice
Psychology
Research
Population
Developmental Psychology

Keywords

  • Developmental psychology
  • Intersectionality
  • Invisibilities
  • Race/ethnicity

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science : Implications for research and institutional practices. / Syed, Moin; Santos, Carlos; Yoo, Hyung Chol; Juang, Linda P.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 73, No. 6, 01.09.2018, p. 812-826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de23693795524f459fbbb7a75a66bb8e,
title = "Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science: Implications for research and institutional practices",
abstract = "Garc{\'i}a Coll et al.'s (1996) integrative model was a landmark article for developmental science, and for psychology more broadly, in outlining the multitude of social and cultural factors at play when seeking to understand the development of racial/ethnic minority children. The time is ripe to not only take stock of those advances but also evaluate the integrative model in the context of present-day research practice within developmental psychology, and psychology more broadly. The purpose of this article is to bring a systemic perspective to developmental science through a discussion of current practices in the field. To do so, we examine invisibility, or how dominant practices serve to overlook, silence, or dismiss knowledge produced by and for racial/ethnic minority populations. Guided by the interpretive framework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991), we discuss three key questions: From whose vantage point is research conducted? What types of questions are valued? And who gets left out? We then conclude with recommendations for changes in practices for individuals, institutions, and the field at large. Importantly, although our analysis is largely grounded in research and practices in developmental psychology, it is also highly relevant to psychological science as a whole.",
keywords = "Developmental psychology, Intersectionality, Invisibilities, Race/ethnicity",
author = "Moin Syed and Carlos Santos and Yoo, {Hyung Chol} and Juang, {Linda P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000294",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "812--826",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science

T2 - Implications for research and institutional practices

AU - Syed, Moin

AU - Santos, Carlos

AU - Yoo, Hyung Chol

AU - Juang, Linda P.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - García Coll et al.'s (1996) integrative model was a landmark article for developmental science, and for psychology more broadly, in outlining the multitude of social and cultural factors at play when seeking to understand the development of racial/ethnic minority children. The time is ripe to not only take stock of those advances but also evaluate the integrative model in the context of present-day research practice within developmental psychology, and psychology more broadly. The purpose of this article is to bring a systemic perspective to developmental science through a discussion of current practices in the field. To do so, we examine invisibility, or how dominant practices serve to overlook, silence, or dismiss knowledge produced by and for racial/ethnic minority populations. Guided by the interpretive framework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991), we discuss three key questions: From whose vantage point is research conducted? What types of questions are valued? And who gets left out? We then conclude with recommendations for changes in practices for individuals, institutions, and the field at large. Importantly, although our analysis is largely grounded in research and practices in developmental psychology, it is also highly relevant to psychological science as a whole.

AB - García Coll et al.'s (1996) integrative model was a landmark article for developmental science, and for psychology more broadly, in outlining the multitude of social and cultural factors at play when seeking to understand the development of racial/ethnic minority children. The time is ripe to not only take stock of those advances but also evaluate the integrative model in the context of present-day research practice within developmental psychology, and psychology more broadly. The purpose of this article is to bring a systemic perspective to developmental science through a discussion of current practices in the field. To do so, we examine invisibility, or how dominant practices serve to overlook, silence, or dismiss knowledge produced by and for racial/ethnic minority populations. Guided by the interpretive framework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991), we discuss three key questions: From whose vantage point is research conducted? What types of questions are valued? And who gets left out? We then conclude with recommendations for changes in practices for individuals, institutions, and the field at large. Importantly, although our analysis is largely grounded in research and practices in developmental psychology, it is also highly relevant to psychological science as a whole.

KW - Developmental psychology

KW - Intersectionality

KW - Invisibilities

KW - Race/ethnicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052962364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052962364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000294

DO - 10.1037/amp0000294

M3 - Article

C2 - 30188168

AN - SCOPUS:85052962364

VL - 73

SP - 812

EP - 826

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 6

ER -