Investing in research: The impact of one academic health center's research grant program

Mark S Paller, Frank B. Cerra

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

External research funding provides the core support for a medical center's research enterprise, and is a major or sole criterion for comparing and ranking institutions. Most grant programs are sufficiently competitive that awards are not granted without the availability of preliminary data. Therefore, institutions may find it necessary to supplement external research funds, particularly as matching funds or as seed funds. The authors report their experience at the University of Minnesota Academic Health Center with two internal grant programs, a seed grant program and an interdisciplinary/ intercollegiate Faculty Research Development (FRD) grant program. Seed grants are one-year, one-time $25,000 awards to investigators to initiate a new direction in research or to develop innovative projects allowing faculty to expand into new research areas. FRD grants are one-time $200,000 awards for a one- to three-year project that support innovative interdisciplinary and interscholastic research with a high potential for future grants.The authors based their analysis of program outcomes on investigators' self-reports of subsequent external grants and peer-reviewed publications stemming from the initial grants. Six annual cycles of the seed grant program (1998-2003) yielded a financial return on investment (ROI) of 560%. Five annual cycles of the FRD grant program (1998-2002) yielded an ROI of 237%. The authors conclude that the AHC grant program has been successful in generating external research funds (primarily National Institutes of Health) and publications; stimulating risk-taking; and developing interdisciplinary and intercollegiate collaboration. They plan to continue the AHC grant program and recommend similar programs to other institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)520-526
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume81
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Organized Financing
grant
Health
health
Research
Financial Management
Seeds
Publications
Research Personnel
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Risk-Taking
Self Report
supplement
Biomedical Research
ranking
funding

Cite this

Investing in research : The impact of one academic health center's research grant program. / Paller, Mark S; Cerra, Frank B.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 520-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Paller, Mark S ; Cerra, Frank B. / Investing in research : The impact of one academic health center's research grant program. In: Academic Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 81, No. 6. pp. 520-526.
@article{b841f68e720e4404ab8088bd007c3d6d,
title = "Investing in research: The impact of one academic health center's research grant program",
abstract = "External research funding provides the core support for a medical center's research enterprise, and is a major or sole criterion for comparing and ranking institutions. Most grant programs are sufficiently competitive that awards are not granted without the availability of preliminary data. Therefore, institutions may find it necessary to supplement external research funds, particularly as matching funds or as seed funds. The authors report their experience at the University of Minnesota Academic Health Center with two internal grant programs, a seed grant program and an interdisciplinary/ intercollegiate Faculty Research Development (FRD) grant program. Seed grants are one-year, one-time $25,000 awards to investigators to initiate a new direction in research or to develop innovative projects allowing faculty to expand into new research areas. FRD grants are one-time $200,000 awards for a one- to three-year project that support innovative interdisciplinary and interscholastic research with a high potential for future grants.The authors based their analysis of program outcomes on investigators' self-reports of subsequent external grants and peer-reviewed publications stemming from the initial grants. Six annual cycles of the seed grant program (1998-2003) yielded a financial return on investment (ROI) of 560{\%}. Five annual cycles of the FRD grant program (1998-2002) yielded an ROI of 237{\%}. The authors conclude that the AHC grant program has been successful in generating external research funds (primarily National Institutes of Health) and publications; stimulating risk-taking; and developing interdisciplinary and intercollegiate collaboration. They plan to continue the AHC grant program and recommend similar programs to other institutions.",
author = "Paller, {Mark S} and Cerra, {Frank B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/01.ACM.0000225214.22831.26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "520--526",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investing in research

T2 - The impact of one academic health center's research grant program

AU - Paller, Mark S

AU - Cerra, Frank B.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - External research funding provides the core support for a medical center's research enterprise, and is a major or sole criterion for comparing and ranking institutions. Most grant programs are sufficiently competitive that awards are not granted without the availability of preliminary data. Therefore, institutions may find it necessary to supplement external research funds, particularly as matching funds or as seed funds. The authors report their experience at the University of Minnesota Academic Health Center with two internal grant programs, a seed grant program and an interdisciplinary/ intercollegiate Faculty Research Development (FRD) grant program. Seed grants are one-year, one-time $25,000 awards to investigators to initiate a new direction in research or to develop innovative projects allowing faculty to expand into new research areas. FRD grants are one-time $200,000 awards for a one- to three-year project that support innovative interdisciplinary and interscholastic research with a high potential for future grants.The authors based their analysis of program outcomes on investigators' self-reports of subsequent external grants and peer-reviewed publications stemming from the initial grants. Six annual cycles of the seed grant program (1998-2003) yielded a financial return on investment (ROI) of 560%. Five annual cycles of the FRD grant program (1998-2002) yielded an ROI of 237%. The authors conclude that the AHC grant program has been successful in generating external research funds (primarily National Institutes of Health) and publications; stimulating risk-taking; and developing interdisciplinary and intercollegiate collaboration. They plan to continue the AHC grant program and recommend similar programs to other institutions.

AB - External research funding provides the core support for a medical center's research enterprise, and is a major or sole criterion for comparing and ranking institutions. Most grant programs are sufficiently competitive that awards are not granted without the availability of preliminary data. Therefore, institutions may find it necessary to supplement external research funds, particularly as matching funds or as seed funds. The authors report their experience at the University of Minnesota Academic Health Center with two internal grant programs, a seed grant program and an interdisciplinary/ intercollegiate Faculty Research Development (FRD) grant program. Seed grants are one-year, one-time $25,000 awards to investigators to initiate a new direction in research or to develop innovative projects allowing faculty to expand into new research areas. FRD grants are one-time $200,000 awards for a one- to three-year project that support innovative interdisciplinary and interscholastic research with a high potential for future grants.The authors based their analysis of program outcomes on investigators' self-reports of subsequent external grants and peer-reviewed publications stemming from the initial grants. Six annual cycles of the seed grant program (1998-2003) yielded a financial return on investment (ROI) of 560%. Five annual cycles of the FRD grant program (1998-2002) yielded an ROI of 237%. The authors conclude that the AHC grant program has been successful in generating external research funds (primarily National Institutes of Health) and publications; stimulating risk-taking; and developing interdisciplinary and intercollegiate collaboration. They plan to continue the AHC grant program and recommend similar programs to other institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745503698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745503698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225214.22831.26

DO - 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225214.22831.26

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16728799

AN - SCOPUS:33745503698

VL - 81

SP - 520

EP - 526

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 6

ER -