Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing

Shu Fen Cheng, Susan Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures of written expression (CBM-W) in terms of writing prompts and scoring methods for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Twenty-two students at the secondary school-level completed 3-min essays within two weeks, which were scored for nine existing and alternative curriculum-based measurement (CBM) scoring methods. The technical features of the nine scoring methods were examined for interrater reliability, alternate-form reliability, and criterion-related validity. The existing CBM scoring method - number of correct minus incorrect word sequences - yielded the highest reliability and validity coefficients. The findings from this study support the use of the CBM-W as a reliable and valid tool for assessing general writing proficiency with secondary students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The CBM alternative scoring methods that may serve as additional indicators of written expression include correct subject - verb agreements, correct clauses, and correct morphemes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-515
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2009

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Hearing
Research Design
Students
curriculum
measurement method
student
Reproducibility of Results
secondary school

Cite this

Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. / Cheng, Shu Fen; Rose, Susan.

In: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Vol. 14, No. 4, 18.09.2009, p. 503-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ecdb2cad28b4fa5bc4828027a4eb214,
title = "Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing",
abstract = "This study investigated the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures of written expression (CBM-W) in terms of writing prompts and scoring methods for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Twenty-two students at the secondary school-level completed 3-min essays within two weeks, which were scored for nine existing and alternative curriculum-based measurement (CBM) scoring methods. The technical features of the nine scoring methods were examined for interrater reliability, alternate-form reliability, and criterion-related validity. The existing CBM scoring method - number of correct minus incorrect word sequences - yielded the highest reliability and validity coefficients. The findings from this study support the use of the CBM-W as a reliable and valid tool for assessing general writing proficiency with secondary students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The CBM alternative scoring methods that may serve as additional indicators of written expression include correct subject - verb agreements, correct clauses, and correct morphemes.",
author = "Cheng, {Shu Fen} and Susan Rose",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/deafed/enp013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "503--515",
journal = "Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education",
issn = "1081-4159",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing

AU - Cheng, Shu Fen

AU - Rose, Susan

PY - 2009/9/18

Y1 - 2009/9/18

N2 - This study investigated the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures of written expression (CBM-W) in terms of writing prompts and scoring methods for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Twenty-two students at the secondary school-level completed 3-min essays within two weeks, which were scored for nine existing and alternative curriculum-based measurement (CBM) scoring methods. The technical features of the nine scoring methods were examined for interrater reliability, alternate-form reliability, and criterion-related validity. The existing CBM scoring method - number of correct minus incorrect word sequences - yielded the highest reliability and validity coefficients. The findings from this study support the use of the CBM-W as a reliable and valid tool for assessing general writing proficiency with secondary students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The CBM alternative scoring methods that may serve as additional indicators of written expression include correct subject - verb agreements, correct clauses, and correct morphemes.

AB - This study investigated the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures of written expression (CBM-W) in terms of writing prompts and scoring methods for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Twenty-two students at the secondary school-level completed 3-min essays within two weeks, which were scored for nine existing and alternative curriculum-based measurement (CBM) scoring methods. The technical features of the nine scoring methods were examined for interrater reliability, alternate-form reliability, and criterion-related validity. The existing CBM scoring method - number of correct minus incorrect word sequences - yielded the highest reliability and validity coefficients. The findings from this study support the use of the CBM-W as a reliable and valid tool for assessing general writing proficiency with secondary students who are deaf or hard of hearing. The CBM alternative scoring methods that may serve as additional indicators of written expression include correct subject - verb agreements, correct clauses, and correct morphemes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249099177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249099177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/deafed/enp013

DO - 10.1093/deafed/enp013

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 503

EP - 515

JO - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

JF - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

SN - 1081-4159

IS - 4

ER -