Investigating the dynamics of elk population size and body mass in a seasonal environment using a mechanistic integral projection model

Shelly Lachish, Ellen E. Brandell, Meggan E. Craft, Andrew P. Dobson, Peter J. Hudson, Daniel R. Macnulty, Tim Coulson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Environmentally mediated changes in body size often underlie population responses to environmental change, yet this is not a universal phenomenon. Understanding when phenotypic change underlies population responses to environmental change is important for obtaining insights and robust predictions of population dynamics in a changing world. We develop a dynamic integral projection model that mechanistically links environmental conditions to demographic rates and phenotypic traits (body size) via changes in resource availability and individual energetics. We apply the model to the northern Yellowstone elk population and explore population responses to changing patterns of seasonality, incorporating the interdependence of growth, demography, and density-dependent processes operating through population feedback on available resources. We found that small changes in body size distributions can have large impacts on population dynamics but need not cause population responses to environmental change. Environmental changes that altered demographic rates directly, via increasing or decreasing resource availability, led to large population impacts in the absence of substantial changes to body size distributions. In contrast, environmentally driven shifts in body size distributions could occur with little consequence for population dynamics when the effect of environmental change on resource availability was small and seasonally restricted and when strong density-dependent processes counteracted expected population responses. These findings highlight that a robust understanding of how associations between body size and demography influence population responses to environmental change will require knowledge of the shape of the relationship between phenotypic distributions and vital rates, the population status with regard to its carrying capacity, and importantly the nature of the environmentally driven change in body size and carrying capacity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E24-E45
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume196
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
S.L. acknowledges the Daphne Jackson Trust, the Natural Environment Research Council, and Wolfson College. T.C. acknowledges the European Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council. P.J.H. acknowledges the Willaman Chair from Penn State College of Science. M.E.C. was funded by the National Science Foundation. We thank many donors to Yellowstone Forever, especially Annie and Bob Graham and Valerie Gates. We also thank Campbell Allen for help with model coding and computing. We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an early version of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Bioenergetics
  • Body size
  • Environmental change
  • Phenotype-demography associations
  • Population dynamics
  • Yellowstone

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the dynamics of elk population size and body mass in a seasonal environment using a mechanistic integral projection model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this