Abstract
The articles by Carruthers and Halliday and by Hagan, Levi, and Ferrales in the present issue of Law and Social Inquiry provide a wonderful opportunity to carry out a brief reflection on the broader field of research on globalization and law. As the discussant and organizer/chair, respectively, of a panel on "Law between Globalization and National Institutions," from which these two articles emerged, we use the following pages to: (1) show how both articles exemplify, in two different ways, what we call the "process turn" in globalization research, (2) identify four theoretical themes these articles speak to, relating them to the broader literature, and (3) draw some lessons for future law and society scholarship in an age of globalization. 1
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 513-519 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Law and Social Inquiry |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction: Global processes, National Institutions, local bricolage: Shaping law in an era of globalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS