Abstract
The comparative study arose from our curiosity about why poli-cies towards e-cigarettes were so different in the UK and Australia, two countries with a shared public health history. The US was added as a case study to see how its unique history of tobacco activism and anti-tobacco activism prefigured and influenced its e-cigarette policy. We outline the history of tobacco policy in the context of public health in each country, showing that a major change occurred after World War II, when tobacco became a key issue of public health concern. All the countries developed stances hostile to tobacco smoking and to the tobacco industry, but differ-ences in the way this was done helped to inform their policies towards e-cigarettes, which cover a spectrum of tolerance. An important source of divergence between the three countries was a history of policy in the UK favouring a harm reduction approach to nicotine. In the US and Australia, while nicotine was used as individual therapy, it was in pursuit of a cession-only strategy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | E-Cigarettes and the Comparative Politics of Harm Reduction |
| Subtitle of host publication | History, Evidence, and Policy |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 1-21 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031236587 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031236570 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023.
Keywords
- Australia
- History
- Nicotine
- Public health
- Tobacco
- UK
- US