Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry

  • Shadi Yaghi
  • , Liqi Shu
  • , Eva A. Mistry
  • , Opeolu Adeoye
  • , Lee Schwamm
  • , Steven Messe
  • , Mitchell S. Mitchell
  • , Malik Ghannam
  • , Adam de Havenon
  • , Karen Furie
  • , Ying Xian
  • , Christopher Streib
  • , Runqi Wangqin
  • , Nils Henninger
  • , Jeffrey L. Saver
  • , Eric E. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a proven effective treatment. Whether thrombolysis in patients with AIS with recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is safe and efficacious is not well established. We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with AIS and recent DOAC use who received thrombolysis to those otherwise eligible but excluded due to recent DOAC use. METHODS: This study included patients for the GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) registry with a diagnosis of AIS within 4.5 hours from last known normal, on a DOAC, and either (1) received intravenous thrombolysis, or (2) were excluded from thrombolysis with coagulopathy being the only reason for exclusion. We used univariate and adjusted binary logistic regression models with clustering by site to compare the 2 groups’ functional status (ambulation on discharge and discharge disposition) and reported rates of safety outcomes in the thrombolysis group. RESULTS: The study sample included 48 907 patients with AIS using a DOAC; 4702 received thrombolysis and 44 205 did not. In adjusted logistic regression models, patients with recent DOAC use receiving thrombolysis had increased odds of independent ambulation at discharge (odds ratio [OR], 1.35[95% CI, 1.21-1.50]) and home discharge (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.22-1.46]). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with recent DOAC use was 3.5% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with recent DOAC use and appeared safe. Given the study limitations, findings require validation by prospective trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere044321
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 30 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. JAHA is available at: www.ahajournals.org/journal/jaha

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • direct oral anticoagulant
  • stroke
  • thrombolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Analysis of the Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this