TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrathoracic pressure regulation to treat intraoperative hypotension
AU - Birch, Martin L
AU - Kwon, Younghoon
AU - Loushin, Michael K.
AU - Puertas, Laura
AU - Prielipp, Richard
AU - Belani, Kumar
AU - Beebe, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 European Society of Anaesthesiology.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Intraoperative hypotension secondary to acute blood loss and fluid shifts increases morbidity and mortality. Intrathoracic pressure regulation (IPR) is a new therapy that enhances circulation by increasing venous return with a negative intrathoracic pressure created noninvasively, either actively (vacuum source or patient inspiration) or passively (chest recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation). OBJECTIVE In this Phase II pilot study, we tested the hypothesis that active IPR therapy would improve the haemodynamic status of patients who developed clinically significant hypotension during abdominal surgery. DESIGN A phase II, single cohort, interventional pilot study. SETTING University of Minnesota Fairview Hospital. PATIENTS Twenty-two patients [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III] were enrolled prospectively of whom 15 experienced intraoperative hypotension. INTERVENTION If intraoperative hypotension occurred more than 10min after induction, the IPR device was applied immediately for a minimum of 10min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The hypotensive SBP immediately before the start of IPR treatment was compared with the SBP obtained at the end of IPR therapy. The paired Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance (P<0.05). RESULTS Fifteen of the 22 patients enrolled experienced 18 hypotensive episodes, which were treated with at least 10min of IPR therapy. Fourteen episodes responded to IPR alone and four episodes (four patients) required additional fluid and vasopressor therapy to treat the hypotension. The group mean±SD SBPs at the onset of the IPR treatment and at the end of IPR treatment were 90.7±9.7 and 98.4±17.4mmHg (P=0.02), respectively. The maximum SBP reached during the treatment was 105.6±19.6mmHg. Pulse pressure increased from 36.8±8.5 mmHg immediately before IPR treatment to 41.5±11.1mmHg (P=0.02) at the end of IPR treatment. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased from 66.3±9.4mmHg immediately before IPR treatment to 71.5±14.4mmHg (P=0.03) at the end of IPR treatment. No adverse events were identified with use of the IPR device. CONCLUSION IPR may be useful in treating intraoperative hypotension without additional fluid or vasopressor therapy. No significant adverse events were observed. On the basis of this phase II pilot study, a larger study is justified.
AB - BACKGROUND Intraoperative hypotension secondary to acute blood loss and fluid shifts increases morbidity and mortality. Intrathoracic pressure regulation (IPR) is a new therapy that enhances circulation by increasing venous return with a negative intrathoracic pressure created noninvasively, either actively (vacuum source or patient inspiration) or passively (chest recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation). OBJECTIVE In this Phase II pilot study, we tested the hypothesis that active IPR therapy would improve the haemodynamic status of patients who developed clinically significant hypotension during abdominal surgery. DESIGN A phase II, single cohort, interventional pilot study. SETTING University of Minnesota Fairview Hospital. PATIENTS Twenty-two patients [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III] were enrolled prospectively of whom 15 experienced intraoperative hypotension. INTERVENTION If intraoperative hypotension occurred more than 10min after induction, the IPR device was applied immediately for a minimum of 10min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The hypotensive SBP immediately before the start of IPR treatment was compared with the SBP obtained at the end of IPR therapy. The paired Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance (P<0.05). RESULTS Fifteen of the 22 patients enrolled experienced 18 hypotensive episodes, which were treated with at least 10min of IPR therapy. Fourteen episodes responded to IPR alone and four episodes (four patients) required additional fluid and vasopressor therapy to treat the hypotension. The group mean±SD SBPs at the onset of the IPR treatment and at the end of IPR treatment were 90.7±9.7 and 98.4±17.4mmHg (P=0.02), respectively. The maximum SBP reached during the treatment was 105.6±19.6mmHg. Pulse pressure increased from 36.8±8.5 mmHg immediately before IPR treatment to 41.5±11.1mmHg (P=0.02) at the end of IPR treatment. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased from 66.3±9.4mmHg immediately before IPR treatment to 71.5±14.4mmHg (P=0.03) at the end of IPR treatment. No adverse events were identified with use of the IPR device. CONCLUSION IPR may be useful in treating intraoperative hypotension without additional fluid or vasopressor therapy. No significant adverse events were observed. On the basis of this phase II pilot study, a larger study is justified.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957882536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957882536&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000234
DO - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000234
M3 - Article
C2 - 25946059
AN - SCOPUS:84957882536
SN - 0265-0215
VL - 32
SP - 376
EP - 380
JO - European Journal of Anaesthesiology
JF - European Journal of Anaesthesiology
IS - 6
ER -