Interpreting one oral health impact profile point

Daniel R. Reissmann, Ira Sierwald, Guido Heydecke, Mike T John

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


Background: Interpretation of scores from oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments, such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) is challenging. It was the aim of this study to determine how many oral impacts correspond to one point of the 49-item OHIP using a new approach which translates numeric problem counts into the traditionally used ordinal OHIP response categories.Methods: A sample of 145 consecutively recruited prosthodontic patients seeking treatment or having a routine examination completed the German version of the 49-item OHIP with the original ordinal response format as a self-administered questionnaire. In addition, the numerical frequencies of impairment during the previous month were requested in personal interviews. Based on a multilevel mixed-effects linear regression, we estimated the mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) in numerical frequency between two adjacent ordinal responses.Results: A numerical frequency of 15.2 (CI: 14.8 - 15.7) impacts per month corresponded to one OHIP point. This translates to approximately one impact every other day in the past month.Conclusions: The oral problem count per day that corresponds to one OHIP-49 point can be used to interpret this instrument's scores in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. This number can help to better understand OHRQoL burden for patients, clinicians, and researchers alike.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number12
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 30 2013


  • Assessment
  • OHIP
  • OHRQoL
  • Response format


Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreting one oral health impact profile point'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this