TY - JOUR
T1 - Interplay of antibiotics and bacterial inoculum on suture-associated biofilms
AU - Hess, Donavon J.
AU - Henry-Stanley, Michelle J.
AU - Wells, Carol L.
PY - 2012/10/1
Y1 - 2012/10/1
N2 - Background: Biofilms are often antibiotic resistant, and it is unclear if prophylactic antibiotics can effectively prevent biofilm formation. Experiments were designed to test the ability of high (bactericidal) concentrations of ampicillin (AMP), vancomycin (VAN), and oxacillin (OXA) to prevent formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low (104) and high (10 7) numbers of Staphylococcus aureus. Materials and methods: S. aureus biofilms were cultivated overnight on silk suture incubated in biofilm growth medium supplemented with bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA. Standard microbiological methods were used to quantify total numbers of viable suture-associated S. aureus. Crystal violet staining followed by spectroscopy was used to quantify biofilm biomass, which includes bacterial cells plus matrix components. To observe the effects of antibiotics on the microscopic appearance of biofilm formation, biofilms were cultivated on glass slides, then stained with fluorescent dyes, and observed by confocal microscopy. Results: In the presence of a relatively low inoculum (104) of S. aureus cells, bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA were effective in preventing development of suture-associated biofilms. However, similar concentrations of these antibiotics were typically ineffective in preventing biofilm development on sutures inoculated with 107 S. aureus, a concentration relevant to contaminated skin. Confocal microscopy confirmed that bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited, but did not prevent, development of S. aureus biofilms. Conclusion: Bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low numbers (104), but not high numbers (107), of S. aureus cells.
AB - Background: Biofilms are often antibiotic resistant, and it is unclear if prophylactic antibiotics can effectively prevent biofilm formation. Experiments were designed to test the ability of high (bactericidal) concentrations of ampicillin (AMP), vancomycin (VAN), and oxacillin (OXA) to prevent formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low (104) and high (10 7) numbers of Staphylococcus aureus. Materials and methods: S. aureus biofilms were cultivated overnight on silk suture incubated in biofilm growth medium supplemented with bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA. Standard microbiological methods were used to quantify total numbers of viable suture-associated S. aureus. Crystal violet staining followed by spectroscopy was used to quantify biofilm biomass, which includes bacterial cells plus matrix components. To observe the effects of antibiotics on the microscopic appearance of biofilm formation, biofilms were cultivated on glass slides, then stained with fluorescent dyes, and observed by confocal microscopy. Results: In the presence of a relatively low inoculum (104) of S. aureus cells, bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA were effective in preventing development of suture-associated biofilms. However, similar concentrations of these antibiotics were typically ineffective in preventing biofilm development on sutures inoculated with 107 S. aureus, a concentration relevant to contaminated skin. Confocal microscopy confirmed that bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited, but did not prevent, development of S. aureus biofilms. Conclusion: Bactericidal concentrations of AMP, VAN, or OXA inhibited formation of suture-associated biofilms initiated with low numbers (104), but not high numbers (107), of S. aureus cells.
KW - Ampicillin
KW - Antibiotics
KW - Biofilm
KW - Biomass
KW - Confocal microscopy
KW - Oxacillin
KW - Staphylococcus aureus
KW - Suture
KW - Vancomycin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866012035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866012035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.040
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 22682712
AN - SCOPUS:84866012035
VL - 177
SP - 334
EP - 340
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
SN - 0022-4804
IS - 2
ER -