Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Expert Consensus on Development of a State of the Art Male Perineal Anatomy Simulation Model for Urethroplasty and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Insertion

  • Andrew J. Cohen
  • , Patrick Saba
  • , Mark (Toto) Abalajon
  • , Katherine T. Anderson
  • , Nima Baradaran
  • , Cooper Benson
  • , William R. Boysen
  • , Benjamin N. Breyer
  • , Arthur L. Burnett
  • , Felix Campos
  • , Lindsay Hampson
  • , Ty T. Higuchi
  • , Niels V. Johnsen
  • , Nicolaas Lumen
  • , Dmitriy Nikolavsky
  • , Joseph Pariser
  • , Jay Simhan
  • , Alex J. Vanni
  • , Nick Warner
  • , E. James Wright
  • Ahmed Ghazi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To create a high-fidelity, non-biohazardous, simulation model to train for urethroplasty or placement of artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) in the bulbar urethra. Narrow, deep and dark: the male perineum is a technically difficult area for learners to gain surgical skills and confidence. Methods: Nineteen high volume reconstructive urologists were recruited to complete a Delphi process to reach an expert consensus on parameters and design specifications for simulation. Consensus (>80%) was reached regarding procedural realism, anatomical realism, and educational effectiveness. Using validated 3D printing and hydrogel molding techniques, we fabricated a model incorporating expert determined aspects. Prototypes were sent to 11 (58%) of the experts who performed skin-to-skin AUS and urethroplasty simulations. Autopsy and questionnaires evaluated the model to determine if the consensus-defined deliverables were met, and confirm the realism of anatomy during the procedures. Results: Overall, experts agreed the model could function as a training tool for urethral surgery. 91%, 82%, and 100% agreed the model procedurally replicates the steps necessary to complete urethral exposure, tissue textures/behaviors, and overall anatomical relationships, respectively. Experts agreed on the fidelity of perineal incision/exposure (91%), urethral dissection/exposure (100%), placement of AUS pump (89%) urethral cuff measurement (100%) urethral spatulation (91%), and urethral mucosal suture placement (91%). Conclusion: We successfully designed a high-fidelity, non-biohazardous, simulation model for urethral procedures in the perineum utilizing expert consensus. The model displayed high procedural and anatomical realism, and has potential as an effective educational platform. This as a groundbreaking tool to enhance training in complex urethral surgeries, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalUrology
Volume201
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Consensus Statement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Expert Consensus on Development of a State of the Art Male Perineal Anatomy Simulation Model for Urethroplasty and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Insertion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this