Intermediate wheatgrass grain and forage yield responses to nitrogen fertilization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Perennial crops have fewer environmental impacts compared to annual crops, but there are no perennial grains available to replace the annual grains that occupy a majority of U.S. cropland. Here we report grain and biomass yields from an improved breeding population of intermediate wheatgrass (IWG) [Th i-nopyrum intermedium (Host) Buckworth & Dewey], a perennial grass being domesticated to serve as the first widely grown perennial grain crop. Our objective was to measure grain and biomass yields of this improved grain-type IWG (TLI-C2), a forage variety of IWG (cultivar Rush), and switchgrass (Pani-cum virgatum L.) in response to N fertilization rates ranging from 0 to 200 kg N ha–1. TLI-C2 grain yields responded qua-dratically to increasing N rates in all but one environment, but yields declined at high N rates due to lodging. TLI-C2 grain yields were highest during the first year of fertilization, yielding 961 and 893 kg ha–1 when fertilized at agronomically optimum nitrogen rates (AONRs) of 61 and 96 kg N ha–1 for stands seeded in fall of 2011 and spring of 2012, respectively. Grain yields declined with stand age. When fertilized with AONRs for grain, biomass yields of TLI-C2 harvested after grain ranged from 9.2 to 12.3 Mg ha–1 and had similar forage and bioenergy quality characteristics compared to Rush, which demonstrates the potential to manage TLI-C2 as a dual-use cropping system for both grain and forage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-472
Number of pages11
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intermediate wheatgrass grain and forage yield responses to nitrogen fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this