Interference-limited versus noise-limited communication over dense wireless networks

Masoud Ebrahimi, Mohammad Maddah-Ali, Amir Khandani

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

A network of n wireless communication links is considered. Rayleigh fading is assumed to be the dominant factor affecting the strength of the channels between nodes. In previous works it is shown that the maximum throughput of this network over all link activation strategies scales as log n. However, it is achieved by assigning a vanishingly small rate to each active link. The objective of this paper is to analyze the achievable throughput of the network when the data rate of each active link is constrained to be a constant λ > 0. A link activation strategy is proposed and analyzed using random graph theory. In the interference-limited regime, a throughput scaling as τ log n is achievable, where the scaling factor r approaches 1 as λ → 0 or λ - ∞. This implies the asymptotic optimality of the proposed scheme. In the noise-limited regime, it is shown that rate-perlinks scaling as log(Δ) are achievable, where Δ0 is a constant and ρ is the transmit signal to noise ratio. However, in this case the throughput decreases by a factor of log log n as compared to the interference-limited regime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication10th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, CWIT 2007
Pages172-175
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event10th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, CWIT 2007 - Edmonton, AB, Canada
Duration: Jun 6 2007Jun 8 2007

Publication series

Name10th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, CWIT 2007

Conference

Conference10th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, CWIT 2007
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityEdmonton, AB
Period6/6/076/8/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interference-limited versus noise-limited communication over dense wireless networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this