Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm

Caroline L. Roberts, Madilyn Larsh, Frank Symons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Historically, the research and treatment of self-injury has been disciplinarily siloed. As a result, the behaviour is understood and treated differently among individuals with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. We explore the potential for an interdisciplinary research and practice agenda in self-injury. Method: We conducted 10 focus groups with experts in self-injury and analysed discussions that resulted from the question: “What is the role of interdisciplinarity in the study and treatment of self-injury?” Results: Through a reflexive thematic analysis we came up with actionable and positively-oriented themes: Interdisciplinarity at the Individual Level, Context of Needed Systems-Level Change, Highlighting Workforce Support, Strategic Use of Implementation and Dissemination Science, and The Pursuit of Integration. Each theme includes several subthemes that describe specific strategies. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary approach is not only possible but worthwhile and would be particularly beneficial to supporting individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities engaging in self-injurious behaviour.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Australasian Society for Intellectual Disability, Inc.

Keywords

  • Intellectual and developmental disabilities
  • Interdisciplinary
  • Nonsuicidal self-injury
  • Qualitative
  • Self-injurious behaviour
  • Self-injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this