Interactions between soil habitat and geographic range location affect plant fitness

John Stanton-Geddes, Ruth G Shaw, Peter L Tiffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


Populations are often found on different habitats at different geographic locations. This habitat shift may be due to biased dispersal, physiological tolerances or biotic interactions. To explore how fitness of the native plant Chamaecrista fasciculata depends on habitat within, at and beyond its range edge, we planted seeds from five populations in two soil substrates at these geographic locations. We found that with reduced competition, lifetime fitness was always greater or equivalent in one habitat type, loam soils, though early-season survival was greater on sand soils. At the range edge, natural populations are typically found on sand soil habitats, which are also less competitive environments. Early-season survival and fitness differed among source populations, and when transplanted beyond the range edge, range edge populations had greater fitness than interior populations. Our results indicate that even when the optimal soil substrate for a species does not change with geographic range location, the realized niche of a species may be restricted to sub-optimal habitats at the range edge because of the combined effects of differences in abiotic and biotic effects (e.g. competitors) between substrates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere36015
JournalPloS one
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 17 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Interactions between soil habitat and geographic range location affect plant fitness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this