Integrating competence and psychopathology

Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development

Ann S. Masten, W. John Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the conceptual and empirical connections between competence and psychopathology, two historically rich traditions for the study of adaptation in development, and what might be gained from their integration. Historical roots of these two traditions are reviewed, then overlaps in their definition are considered, with a focus on the ways in which judgments about competence enter into the nosology of mental disorders. DSM-IV is analyzed from the perspective of competence, and the debate about "harmful dysfunction" in defining mental disorder is discussed in relation to competence. Different models explaining the empirical associations of competence and psychopathology are delineated, and illustrative empirical evidence is provided. Potential explanations include confounded concepts and methods, symptoms undermining the effectiveness of adaptation in the environment, failures in age-salient developmental tasks leading to emotional and behavioral problems, transactional influences, shared vulnerability or risk factors producing both kinds of difficulties, and more complex models. The potential benefits of integrating competence and psychopathology as two major approaches to adaptation are discussed in regard to theory, classification of mental disorder, research, and intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-550
Number of pages22
JournalDevelopment and psychopathology
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Psychopathology
Mental Competency
Mental Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Research

Cite this

Integrating competence and psychopathology : Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development. / Masten, Ann S.; Curtis, W. John.

In: Development and psychopathology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 529-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{33cdbac2238442a9a2187993ea1e90ab,
title = "Integrating competence and psychopathology: Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development",
abstract = "This paper examines the conceptual and empirical connections between competence and psychopathology, two historically rich traditions for the study of adaptation in development, and what might be gained from their integration. Historical roots of these two traditions are reviewed, then overlaps in their definition are considered, with a focus on the ways in which judgments about competence enter into the nosology of mental disorders. DSM-IV is analyzed from the perspective of competence, and the debate about {"}harmful dysfunction{"} in defining mental disorder is discussed in relation to competence. Different models explaining the empirical associations of competence and psychopathology are delineated, and illustrative empirical evidence is provided. Potential explanations include confounded concepts and methods, symptoms undermining the effectiveness of adaptation in the environment, failures in age-salient developmental tasks leading to emotional and behavioral problems, transactional influences, shared vulnerability or risk factors producing both kinds of difficulties, and more complex models. The potential benefits of integrating competence and psychopathology as two major approaches to adaptation are discussed in regard to theory, classification of mental disorder, research, and intervention.",
author = "Masten, {Ann S.} and Curtis, {W. John}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S095457940000314X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "529--550",
journal = "Development and Psychopathology",
issn = "0954-5794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating competence and psychopathology

T2 - Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development

AU - Masten, Ann S.

AU - Curtis, W. John

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the conceptual and empirical connections between competence and psychopathology, two historically rich traditions for the study of adaptation in development, and what might be gained from their integration. Historical roots of these two traditions are reviewed, then overlaps in their definition are considered, with a focus on the ways in which judgments about competence enter into the nosology of mental disorders. DSM-IV is analyzed from the perspective of competence, and the debate about "harmful dysfunction" in defining mental disorder is discussed in relation to competence. Different models explaining the empirical associations of competence and psychopathology are delineated, and illustrative empirical evidence is provided. Potential explanations include confounded concepts and methods, symptoms undermining the effectiveness of adaptation in the environment, failures in age-salient developmental tasks leading to emotional and behavioral problems, transactional influences, shared vulnerability or risk factors producing both kinds of difficulties, and more complex models. The potential benefits of integrating competence and psychopathology as two major approaches to adaptation are discussed in regard to theory, classification of mental disorder, research, and intervention.

AB - This paper examines the conceptual and empirical connections between competence and psychopathology, two historically rich traditions for the study of adaptation in development, and what might be gained from their integration. Historical roots of these two traditions are reviewed, then overlaps in their definition are considered, with a focus on the ways in which judgments about competence enter into the nosology of mental disorders. DSM-IV is analyzed from the perspective of competence, and the debate about "harmful dysfunction" in defining mental disorder is discussed in relation to competence. Different models explaining the empirical associations of competence and psychopathology are delineated, and illustrative empirical evidence is provided. Potential explanations include confounded concepts and methods, symptoms undermining the effectiveness of adaptation in the environment, failures in age-salient developmental tasks leading to emotional and behavioral problems, transactional influences, shared vulnerability or risk factors producing both kinds of difficulties, and more complex models. The potential benefits of integrating competence and psychopathology as two major approaches to adaptation are discussed in regard to theory, classification of mental disorder, research, and intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034195065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034195065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S095457940000314X

DO - 10.1017/S095457940000314X

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 529

EP - 550

JO - Development and Psychopathology

JF - Development and Psychopathology

SN - 0954-5794

IS - 3

ER -