Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states

Greg H Lindsey, Krista Nordback, Miguel Andres Figliozzi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information about nonmotorized traffic is needed to support management of transportation systems. However, transportation officials across the United States generally have not monitored nonmotorized traffic, and most agencies lack bicycle and pedestrian counts. This paper describes current efforts by the Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to establish programs for monitoring non-motorized traffic. With FHWA principles for traffic monitoring as a framework, this case study summarizes state approaches for initiating monitoring, agency collaboration with local governments, and continuous and short-duration monitoring efforts. Agency protocols for data collection, analysis, and management, including development of factors for purposes such as estimating average daily bicyclists or bicycle miles traveled, are also compared. Agency efforts to demonstrate the effectiveness of monitoring technologies are described. This study reveals similar objectives across states, both similarities and differences in approaches, differing rates of implementation, and similar problems in implementation. The paper summarizes lessons learned and identifies challenges that DOTs will face in institutionalizing the monitoring of nonmotorized traffic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTransportation Research Record
PublisherNational Research Council
Pages134-142
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780309295314
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Publication series

NameTransportation Research Record
Volume2443
ISSN (Print)0361-1981

Fingerprint

Bicycles
Monitoring

Cite this

Lindsey, G. H., Nordback, K., & Figliozzi, M. A. (2014). Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states. In Transportation Research Record (pp. 134-142). (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2443). National Research Council. https://doi.org/10.3141/2443-15

Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states. / Lindsey, Greg H; Nordback, Krista; Figliozzi, Miguel Andres.

Transportation Research Record. National Research Council, 2014. p. 134-142 (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2443).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lindsey, GH, Nordback, K & Figliozzi, MA 2014, Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states. in Transportation Research Record. Transportation Research Record, vol. 2443, National Research Council, pp. 134-142. https://doi.org/10.3141/2443-15
Lindsey GH, Nordback K, Figliozzi MA. Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states. In Transportation Research Record. National Research Council. 2014. p. 134-142. (Transportation Research Record). https://doi.org/10.3141/2443-15
Lindsey, Greg H ; Nordback, Krista ; Figliozzi, Miguel Andres. / Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states. Transportation Research Record. National Research Council, 2014. pp. 134-142 (Transportation Research Record).
@inbook{76ef3fcbf7c64201b41924e923e5cbe0,
title = "Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states",
abstract = "Information about nonmotorized traffic is needed to support management of transportation systems. However, transportation officials across the United States generally have not monitored nonmotorized traffic, and most agencies lack bicycle and pedestrian counts. This paper describes current efforts by the Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to establish programs for monitoring non-motorized traffic. With FHWA principles for traffic monitoring as a framework, this case study summarizes state approaches for initiating monitoring, agency collaboration with local governments, and continuous and short-duration monitoring efforts. Agency protocols for data collection, analysis, and management, including development of factors for purposes such as estimating average daily bicyclists or bicycle miles traveled, are also compared. Agency efforts to demonstrate the effectiveness of monitoring technologies are described. This study reveals similar objectives across states, both similarities and differences in approaches, differing rates of implementation, and similar problems in implementation. The paper summarizes lessons learned and identifies challenges that DOTs will face in institutionalizing the monitoring of nonmotorized traffic.",
author = "Lindsey, {Greg H} and Krista Nordback and Figliozzi, {Miguel Andres}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/2443-15",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Transportation Research Record",
publisher = "National Research Council",
pages = "134--142",
booktitle = "Transportation Research Record",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Institutionalizing bicycle and pedestrian monitoring programs in three states

AU - Lindsey, Greg H

AU - Nordback, Krista

AU - Figliozzi, Miguel Andres

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Information about nonmotorized traffic is needed to support management of transportation systems. However, transportation officials across the United States generally have not monitored nonmotorized traffic, and most agencies lack bicycle and pedestrian counts. This paper describes current efforts by the Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to establish programs for monitoring non-motorized traffic. With FHWA principles for traffic monitoring as a framework, this case study summarizes state approaches for initiating monitoring, agency collaboration with local governments, and continuous and short-duration monitoring efforts. Agency protocols for data collection, analysis, and management, including development of factors for purposes such as estimating average daily bicyclists or bicycle miles traveled, are also compared. Agency efforts to demonstrate the effectiveness of monitoring technologies are described. This study reveals similar objectives across states, both similarities and differences in approaches, differing rates of implementation, and similar problems in implementation. The paper summarizes lessons learned and identifies challenges that DOTs will face in institutionalizing the monitoring of nonmotorized traffic.

AB - Information about nonmotorized traffic is needed to support management of transportation systems. However, transportation officials across the United States generally have not monitored nonmotorized traffic, and most agencies lack bicycle and pedestrian counts. This paper describes current efforts by the Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to establish programs for monitoring non-motorized traffic. With FHWA principles for traffic monitoring as a framework, this case study summarizes state approaches for initiating monitoring, agency collaboration with local governments, and continuous and short-duration monitoring efforts. Agency protocols for data collection, analysis, and management, including development of factors for purposes such as estimating average daily bicyclists or bicycle miles traveled, are also compared. Agency efforts to demonstrate the effectiveness of monitoring technologies are described. This study reveals similar objectives across states, both similarities and differences in approaches, differing rates of implementation, and similar problems in implementation. The paper summarizes lessons learned and identifies challenges that DOTs will face in institutionalizing the monitoring of nonmotorized traffic.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938570231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938570231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/2443-15

DO - 10.3141/2443-15

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84938570231

T3 - Transportation Research Record

SP - 134

EP - 142

BT - Transportation Research Record

PB - National Research Council

ER -