Institutional trust, beliefs, and evaluation of regulations, and management of chronic wasting disease (CWD)

Susan A. Schroeder, Adam C. Landon, Louis Cornicelli, David C. Fulton, Leslie McInenly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Institutional trust and perceptions of regulatory efficacy can affect support for management. This study examined how institutional trust, specific trust related to information/management, and support for/perceived efficacy of current regulations related to deer hunters’ attitudes about chronic wasting disease (CWD) management. Results are from a survey of southeastern Minnesota deer hunters from the 2018 season, and suggest acceptance of agency management by a majority of hunters. However, a substantial minority of hunters who perceived the management approach was “too aggressive” believed all CWD regulations were ineffective and opposed regulations other than mandatory disease testing and carcass movement restrictions. Results suggest that a lack of shared values, along with greater trust in agency CWD information and technical competence, correlated with perceiving the management approach as “too aggressive.” Future research is needed to understand the contextual nature of trust and how different elements of trust relate to acceptability of management actions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • Chronic wasting disease (CWD)
  • information
  • institutional trust
  • management
  • regulations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional trust, beliefs, and evaluation of regulations, and management of chronic wasting disease (CWD)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this