Abstract
In the spring of 2015, 11 years after a mentally ill young man named Dan Markingson stabbed himself to death in an industry-sponsored drug study, officials at the University of Minnesota suspended recruitment of subjects into drug trials in its Department of Psychiatry. University officials agreed to act only after a scathing investigation by Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor found damning evidence of coerced recruitment, inadequate clinical care, superficial research oversight, a web of serious, disturbing conflicts of interest, and a pattern of misleading public statements by university officials aimed at deflecting scrutiny. In this article, I examine the larger institutional factors leading up to Markingson’s suicide and prevented corrective action for so long.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-79 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Accountability in Research |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 17 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Taylor & Francis.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Conflict of interest
- human subjects ethics
- human subjects regulation and oversight
- informed consent
- misconduct in research
- organizational and institutional ethics
- research ethics
- research ethics in university contexts
- research on the mentally ill
- vulnerable populations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Pathology and the Death of Dan Markingson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS