TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional Measures for Supporting OER in Higher Education
T2 - An International Case-Based Study
AU - Marín, Victoria I.
AU - Zawacki-Richter, Olaf
AU - Aydin, Cengiz H.
AU - Bedenlier, Svenja
AU - Bond, Melissa
AU - Bozkurt, Aras
AU - Conrad, Dianne
AU - Jung, Insung
AU - ondakci, Yasar
AU - Prinsloo, Paul
AU - Roberts, Jennifer
AU - Veletsianos, George
AU - Xiao, Junhong
AU - Zhang, Jingjing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Victoria I. Marín et al., published by De Gruyter.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education cannot be put into practice without considering institutional contexts, which differ not only globally but also within the same country. Each institutional context provides educators with opportunities or limitations where Open Educational Practices (OEP) and OER for teaching and learning are involved. As part of a broader research project, and as a follow-up to national perspectives, an international comparison was conducted, based on institutional cases of nine different higher education systems (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey). Aspects regarding the availability of infrastructure and institutional policies for OER, as well as the existence of measures directed at OER quality assurance and at the promotion of the development and use of OER were covered. The resulting theoretical contribution sheds light on an international comparative view of OER and points towards country-specific trends, as well as differences among institutions. These aspects could provide an impetus for the development of institutional guidelines and measures. In line with international literature on the topic, recommendations are derived to promote/ enhance the use of OER in teaching and learning in higher education at the institutional level.
AB - Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education cannot be put into practice without considering institutional contexts, which differ not only globally but also within the same country. Each institutional context provides educators with opportunities or limitations where Open Educational Practices (OEP) and OER for teaching and learning are involved. As part of a broader research project, and as a follow-up to national perspectives, an international comparison was conducted, based on institutional cases of nine different higher education systems (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Turkey). Aspects regarding the availability of infrastructure and institutional policies for OER, as well as the existence of measures directed at OER quality assurance and at the promotion of the development and use of OER were covered. The resulting theoretical contribution sheds light on an international comparative view of OER and points towards country-specific trends, as well as differences among institutions. These aspects could provide an impetus for the development of institutional guidelines and measures. In line with international literature on the topic, recommendations are derived to promote/ enhance the use of OER in teaching and learning in higher education at the institutional level.
KW - Higher education institutions
KW - faculty development
KW - institutional policies
KW - international case-based study
KW - open educational resources (OER)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138097600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138097600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/edu-2022-0019
DO - 10.1515/edu-2022-0019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138097600
SN - 2544-7831
VL - 4
SP - 310
EP - 321
JO - Open Education Studies
JF - Open Education Studies
IS - 1
ER -